Key result
Elevated cardiac and renal biomarkers linked to substantially higher in-hospital mortality in ADHF.
Why the study?
Despite improved treatment, prognosis for patients hospitalized for acutely decompensated heart failure remains poor with high mortality rates, and the prognostic value of laboratory tests needs exploration.
Observational (n=165)
p-value: p=<0.001
NT-proBNP provides the best discriminatory power for predicting in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure, while routine labs like RDW and renal function markers also have significant prognostic value.
Objectives Despite improved treatment during last 20 years, prognosis for patients hospitalized for acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is poor and mortality rates reported for these patients are high. Laboratory results can assist clinicians in evaluation and triaging of patients on hospital admission, and are important for the medical decision-making and prognosis assessments. Recently, new guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic HF patients were published introducing a new group of patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods In order to explore the prognostic value for the in-hospital mortality of ADHF patients we analyzed laboratory test results for 165 emergency hospitalized patients regarding the survival and LVEF. Results In-hospital mortality was 16%. Patients who died were older than survivals (p = 0.003). There were no differences in LVEF between survivals and non-survivals. Patients who survived had significantly lower N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), uric acid, urea, creatinine, and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) than patients who died (p < 0.001). All these tests had a good discrimination power between survivals and non-survivals (p < 0.001), but their incremental addition to NT-proBNP didn't improve its overall prognostic value. There was only a very weak correlation between NT-proBNP concentrations and LVEF. Groups with different LVEF status showed significant difference in number of erythrocytes, RDW and hemoglobin concentrations. Conclusions NT-proBNP had the best discriminatory power between survivals and non-survivals. Some routine laboratory test results, like RDW, uric acid, urea, and creatinine, have potentially significant value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dvornik et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Acutely decompensated heart failure (n=165). Laboratory biomarkers (NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, uric acid, urea, creatinine, RDW) vs. Survivors (lower biomarker levels) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=<0.001). Higher levels of NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, uric acid, urea, creatinine, and RDW were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (16% overall rate) in patients with ADHF (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: