Why the study?
Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) has expanded treatment options for secondary severe tricuspid regurgitation, but the prognostic value of pivotal-trial eligibility criteria in real-world patients is unclear.
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) eligibility based on pivotal trial criteria effectively stratify the prognosis of real-world patients with secondary severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Cohort (n=1,062)
Yes
Does transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) eligibility based on pivotal trial criteria effectively stratify the prognosis of real-world patients with secondary severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Applying TTVR pivotal-trial eligibility criteria to real-world patients with secondary severe TR provides an effective disease-stage framework that identifies a graded risk of death or heart failure hospitalization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Symptomatic TTVR-ineligible patients face higher adjusted event risk; hypothesis-generating for trial eligibility criteria as prognostic framework in secondary severe TR.
Background: Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) has expanded the treatment options for secondary severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). We examined whether pivotal-trial eligibility criteria for TTVR stratify prognosis in a real-world cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kusunose et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Secondary severe tricuspid regurgitation (n=1,062). TTVR eligibility classification (symptomatic status and TRISCEND II trial exclusion criteria) vs. Group 1 (asymptomatic / NYHA Class I) was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization (HR 2.88, 95% CI 2.16-3.84, p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: