Key result
LVA ablation linked to ~5-fold higher heart failure hospitalizations in paroxysmal AF with low-voltage areas.
Why the study?
The impact of extensive atrial ablation, specifically low-voltage area ablation, on long-term heart failure risk after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation remains unclear.
Does low-voltage-area ablation increase the risk of heart failure hospitalization in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=398)
Does low-voltage-area ablation increase the risk of heart failure hospitalization in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 30% vs 6%
p-value: p=0.01
In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and low-voltage areas, low-voltage-area ablation is associated with an increased long-term risk of heart failure hospitalization despite high rates of sinus rhythm maintenance.
LVA ablation in paroxysmal AF was associated with HF outcomes; leaves open whether it alters long-term HF risk, warranting prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: Extensive atrial ablation may impair atrial function; however, its impact on long-term heart failure (HF) risk remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the association between low-voltage area (LVA) ablation and HF outcomes after catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: This was a long-term follow-up analysis of the Volatile Coronary Lesion and Obstructive Nodal Atrial Fibrillation trial. A total of 398 patients were followed for up to 7 years and classified into 3 groups: no LVAs (group A), LVAs with LVA ablation (group B), and LVAs without LVA ablation (group C). The primary outcome was HF hospitalization. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 1,660 (735-2,555) days, HF hospitalization occurred in 21 patients. Sinus rhythm was maintained in 96% of patients, with no differences among groups (P = 0.26). Patients with LVAs had a higher incidence of HF hospitalization than those without (18% vs 3%; P < 0.001). Among patients with LVAs, HF hospitalization occurred more frequently in those undergoing LVA ablation (30% vs 6%; P = 0.01). In a competing-risk analysis accounting for all-cause death, the cumulative incidence of HF hospitalization remained significantly higher in patients undergoing LVA ablation (Gray's test, P = 0.042). Among patients who experienced HF hospitalization, most events occurred during documented sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with paroxysmal AF and LVAs, LVA ablation was associated with a higher incidence of HF hospitalization despite a high rate of sinus rhythm maintenance. Given the limited sample size and number of events, these findings should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating, and warrant confirmation in larger prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ochi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=398). Low-voltage area (LVA) ablation vs. No LVA ablation (in patients with LVAs) was evaluated on Heart failure hospitalization (p=0.01). In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and low-voltage areas, LVA ablation was associated with more heart failure hospitalizations than no LVA ablation (30% vs 6%; P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: