Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study aims to describe the implementation of academic supervision and the quality of learning management and to analyze the effect of academic supervision on teachers’ learning management quality in public elementary schools in Luhak Nan Duo District, West Pasaman Regency. This study employed a quantitative approach with a causal associative design. The population consisted of 357 teachers, with a sample of 110 teachers selected using proportional stratified random sampling based on years of service. Data were collected using a five-point Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics and simple linear regression with IBM SPSS Statistics 23. The results showed that the quality of learning management was categorized as high, with an achievement level of 85.00%, while academic supervision was categorized as moderate, with an achievement level of 76.11%. Academic supervision had a positive and significant effect on learning management quality, with a regression coefficient of 0.288, t-count of 5.452 > t-table of 1.982, and significance of 0.000 < 0.05. Academic supervision contributed 21.6% to the variation in learning management quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haryanti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: