Key result
Lean mass-adjusted peak VO2 outperforms unadjusted peak VO2 in predicting CV death and transplantation.
Why the study?
Adjustment of peak oxygen consumption to lean body mass may provide a more accurate risk stratification in chronic heart failure patients due to variability in body fat content.
Does peak oxygen consumption adjusted for lean body mass improve the prognostic prediction of cardiovascular death or transplant in patients with chronic heart failure compared to unadjusted peak oxygen consumption?
Cohort (n=225)
Does peak oxygen consumption adjusted for lean body mass improve the prognostic prediction of cardiovascular death or transplant in patients with chronic heart failure compared to unadjusted peak oxygen consumption?
p-value: p=0.003
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“The exact mechanism for lower relative peak VO2 (adjusted to body weight) in women with HFrEF is unknown, but it has been proposed that this is perhaps due to higher body fat in women. Adipose tissue is not aerobically active, and thus, when peak VO2 is adjusted for total body weight, women tend to have a lower peak VO2. Consistent with this concept, peak VO2 adjusted to lean body mass has been shown to be a better predictor of mortality in women and in obese patients with HFrEF.”
Adjusting peak oxygen consumption to lean body mass yields a more accurate prognostic discriminator for timing cardiac transplantation in chronic heart failure patients, particularly for obese patients and women.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess whether the adjustment of peak oxygen consumption (PkVO2) to lean body mass would yield a more accurate discriminator of outcomes in the chronic heart failure population. BACKGROUND: Peak oxygen consumption is traditionally used to risk stratify patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and to time cardiac transplantation. There is, however, considerable variability in body fat content, which represents metabolically inactive mass. METHODS: In 225 consecutive patients with CHF, the percentage of body fat was determined by the sum of skinfolds technique. All underwent CPX using a ramping treadmill protocol. Mean follow-up duration was 18.9+/-11.3 months. RESULTS: There were 14 cardiovascular deaths and 15 transplants. Peak oxygen consumption lean, both as a continuous variable and using a cutoff of < or =19 ml/kg/min, was a better predictor of outcome than unadjusted PkVO2 (p = 0.003 vs. 0.027 for the continuous variables and p = 0.0006 vs. 0.055 for < or =19 ml/kg/min and < or =14 ml/kg/min unadjusted body weight, respectively). Using partial correlation index R statistics, the Cox model using PkVO2 lean < or =19 ml/kg/min, in addition to age and etiology of CHF as covariates, yielded the strongest predictive relationship to the combined end point (chi-square value 24.32). Especially in the obese patients and in women, there was considerably better correlation of PkVO2 lean with outcome than the unadjusted PkVO2. CONCLUSIONS: The adjustment of PkVO2 to lean body mass increases the prognostic value of cardiopulmonary stress testing in the evaluation of patients with chronic heart failure. The use of <19 ml O2/kg of lean body mass/min as a cutoff in PkVO2 should be used for timing transplantation, particularly in women and the obese.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osman et al. (2000) conducted a cohort in Chronic heart failure (n=225). Peak oxygen consumption adjusted to lean body mass (PkVO2 lean) vs. Unadjusted peak oxygen consumption (PkVO2) was evaluated on Combined endpoint of cardiovascular death and transplantation (p=0.003). Peak oxygen consumption adjusted to lean body mass was a significantly better predictor of cardiovascular death and transplantation than unadjusted peak oxygen consumption (p=0.003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: