Key result
Atrial leadless pacing improves hemodynamics and reduces BNP in sick sinus syndrome with heart failure.
Why the study?
Atrial leadless pacing may offer a therapeutic option for patients with sick sinus syndrome and heart failure when conventional transvenous atrial pacing is undesirable or high infection risk exists.
Does atrial leadless pacing improve hemodynamics and symptoms in patients with sick sinus syndrome and heart failure?
Case Report (n=2)
Does atrial leadless pacing improve hemodynamics and symptoms in patients with sick sinus syndrome and heart failure?
Atrial leadless pacing is feasible and can provide effective treatment for patients with sick sinus syndrome and heart failure, including when combined with an S-ICD in high infection risk scenarios.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Leadless dual-chamber pacing may improve hemodynamics in select HF patients with SSS; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Two patients with sick sinus syndrome and heart failure were treated with atrial leadless pacing. Case 1 demonstrated hemodynamic improvement with cardiac output increase (3.0 → 5.1 L/min), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) reduction (3223 → 480 pg/mL), and New York Heart Association class improvement (III → I) following Aveir dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (Abbott Medical, Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA) implantation. Case 2, at high infection risk with mechanical valve and prior endocarditis, received hybrid therapy combining atrial fibrillation ablation, Aveir atrial pacing, and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, achieving left ventricular ejection fraction improvement (20 → 38%) and BNP reduction (321 → 28 pg/mL). Atrial leadless pacing may represent a therapeutic option in selected patients with preserved atrioventricular conduction or high infection risk requiring physiologic pacing. Learning objective This case report demonstrates that atrial leadless pacing can be an effective treatment option for patients with sick sinus syndrome complicated by heart failure when conventional transvenous atrial pacing is undesirable. In one of the presented cases, the feasibility of combining a leadless pacemaker with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator is also illustrated, providing insight into a potential lead-free device strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sato et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Sick sinus syndrome and heart failure (n=2). Atrial leadless pacing (Aveir leadless pacemaker) was evaluated. Atrial leadless pacing resulted in hemodynamic improvements and BNP reduction in two patients with sick sinus syndrome and heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: