SAE Political Economy · Paper 3: Checks / SAE 政治经济学 第三篇: 制衡

When an economic position grows so large that many people cannot get around it, how strong must the checks on it be, and where do they fall? This paper asks eight things: how checks increase with the power-face; what, beyond checks, a construct that does the work of the Base Layer requires; whether the public and the private each have an exemption of their own; when the line has not been crossed and the channels are there, whether those acted on have actual control over the position, and how the positions that check it are themselves questioned; whether checks fall on capacity or on use; how the purchase of a substitute road that has not yet grown is to be reckoned; to which layer measures, forms and thresholds belong; and how to read a construct large enough to leave when it makes relocation a condition. A few matters in the Kingdom State run through the whole paper: Crossways Market is both the marketplace and a seller within it, and its search ranking, its price terms and its tying of logistics fall on forty thousand sellers, while five of the seven members of the Seller Appeals Committee it set up are appointed by its management; Crossways buys Willow Basket Market, and Willow Basket stops running; the Competition Review Division recommends separating the marketplace from its own retail, the State Legislature considers an Online Marketplaces bill, and Crossways declares that it can move its headquarters away. The larger an economic position's power-face, the stronger the checks on it: this is this series' normative undertaking, not a structural theorem; the power-face is compared by its particular effects, not by total assets. Where what a construct does falls in the Emergence Layer, checks are the main thing; where it falls in the Base Layer, beyond checks, the institution must also secure that supply, and securing is not an endorsement. An accumulated position with a comparable power-face is not exempted for being private, nor does the public side gain a separate exemption. Control within the line is examined by three questions: who can activate it, what actual efficacy it has, and how the party questioned cannot cancel it on its own; the decisions of those who check are questioned by the same three questions. Checks fall on how it is used, and do not aim at lowering capacity; where capacity and the sealing-off of roads sit in one place, the cost is stated as it stands. No economic position may monopolize the power to shut the door. Measures, forms and thresholds lie at the rule layer; below the threshold, guarding the line and being questioned are not weaker. The exit of the strong shows a power-face under structural dependence. The paper interfaces in place with Robeyns's *Limitarianism* and Anderson's *Private Government*. The paper has eight propositions (E14 to E20, with E14a), each stated at the end of its section and listed together at the end. 一个经济位置大到许多人都绕不过去时,制衡要多强,落在哪里?这一篇问八件事:制衡怎样随权力面递增;做基础层之事的构,制衡之外还要什么;公的与私的是否各有豁免;线没有越、通道也在时,受作用的人对它有没有实际的控制,制衡它的位置自己又怎样受问;制衡落在能力上还是落在用法上;收购一条尚未长大的替代之路怎样算;量法、形态与门槛归哪一层;一个大到走得了的构以迁出为条件,怎样读。全篇以王国州的几件事贯穿:通衢市集既是场,又在场里卖,搜索排序、价格条款与物流绑定落在四万家卖家身上,它设的卖家申诉委员会七人里五人由管理层任命;通衢收购柳筐市集,柳筐停运;竞争审查处建议场与自营分开,州议会审一部线上市集法,通衢声明可以把总部迁走。经济位置的权力面越大,制衡越强,这是本系列的规范承担,不是一条结构定理;权力面按具体的作用比较,不按资产总额。构所做的事落在涌现层的,以制衡为主;落在基础层的,制衡之外,制度还要保障那一项供给,保障不是背书。权力面相当的积累位置,不因私有而豁免,公的一侧也不另得豁免。线内的控制照三问核:谁能启动,有什么实际效力,被问的一方怎样不能独自取消它;制衡者自己的决定同样照这三问受问。制衡落在怎样使用上,不以压低能力为目的;能力与封路同在一处时,照实说明代价。没有一个经济位置可以独占关门之权。量法、形态与门槛在规则层;门槛以下,守线与受问不弱。强者的退出,在结构依赖下显出权力面。随文与罗宾斯的《限富主义》、安德森的《私人政府》对接。全篇八条(E14 至 E20,含 E14a),各节末写出,篇末合列。 Related works Relation Identifier Scheme Resource type Title References 10.5281/zenodo.19328662 DOI Publication / Preprint How Is Institution Possible: From Inter-Ontological Remainder to Co-Constructive Framework (SAE Foundational Paper 6) References 10.5281/zenodo.21093939 DOI Publication / Preprint The Interface and Transformation between Recognition-Based Rights and Power (SAE Rights Theory, Paper 4) References 10.5281/zenodo.23270384 DOI Publication / Preprint Not Crossing the Line (SAE Institution Theory, Paper 2) References 10.5281/zenodo.23270766 DOI Publication / Preprint Guarding the Line (SAE Institution Theory, Paper 3) References 10.5281/zenodo.23271324 DOI Publication / Preprint Open to Questioning (SAE Institution Theory, Paper 6) References 10.5281/zenodo.23413112 DOI Publication / Preprint Guarantee (SAE Theory of Government, Paper 3) References 10.5281/zenodo.23413192 DOI Publication / Preprint Levels (SAE Theory of Government, Paper 4) References 10.5281/zenodo.23413511 DOI Publication / Preprint Questioning and Bearing (SAE Theory of Government, Paper 6) References 10.5281/zenodo.23815796 DOI Publication / Preprint The Close (SAE Theory of Inter-State Cooperation, Paper 8) References 10.5281/zenodo.19358010 DOI Publication / Preprint Four Layers of Economic Rationality: A Diagnostic Extension of the Rational Agent from Dimensional Sequence Theory (SAE Economics, Paper 1)