Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When does an economic position become a place others cannot get around? And when they cannot get around it, do the people there still have a real way? This paper asks these two things at the level of relations. The first six sections are set in Springhollow: a water company with only fourteen employees is the sole supplier of piped water to two villages, and after raising its price by sixty percent it issues one and the same cut-off notice to both villages; Lower Hollow, by a vote of its village assembly years earlier, ceded the plots of its old wells, and the company filled the old wells in; Upper Hollow had no agreement, and its old wells dried up one after another, the cause not determined. The last three sections are set in Bluekiln: a porcelain works that employs seventy percent of the town's working population, whose employment contract has articles on dormitories, scrip, wage advances and non-competition; what a veteran kiln worker who wanted to leave actually ran into was that, while his advance was unpaid, the company did not consent to his leaving, and once he had repaid it he was blocked by the non-compete article, which was later undone by a sum someone put up. The paper sets out nine propositions. A chokepoint is a position others cannot get around on the way to sustaining their lives or unfolding their own paths; it has two magnitudes, breadth and depth, and small power can run deep. Ceasing one's own supply has three readings: where the supply has not been promised, has not been embedded, and has not been preceded by sealing off the way, ceasing it does not constitute severing; where it has been promised or embedded, its withdrawal is examined separately by the register it has entered, and embedding can also come through recognition-based loading; first sealing off the way, inducing dependence, and then withdrawing, is severing; the three readings can coexist within one arrangement. Where there has already been an exclusive laying of hands, lifting the closure is ceasing to compress, not granting a right. As to which resources count as the content of basic rights, the normative layer sets only criteria, and the list lies at the rule layer. Force is recognized only where judgment is substituted, and the part that falls on the life-substrate must be carved out. The sole position of supply at the life-substrate holds the accountability of supply, which has two routes, and the institution or government that manages it holds the accountability of creating conditions for supply; accountability binds the position, and the efficacy of exit is not the procedure of exit. Many constraints can together cross the line. Fork Rights is the right to choose; a non-compete agreement takes away a person's choice after leaving and violates Fork Rights, with compensation as without, its gravity depending on how wide a reach it has; it does not fall among local, reversible limits, and this series' suggestion to the rule layer is that, in principle, no opening be made to permit it; a constraint set to protect others, which limits only the step by which he would violate others' ends, is not among them; a conditional payment, when it passes all three criteria, does not take away the choice, and falls within the room the normative layer leaves to the rule layer. That exit is real guards not only the person of the present but also the premise of emergence. The paper is set beside Polanyi and Thompson (per secondary sources) and Hirschman (cited at second hand) in place. The paper has nine propositions (E7 to E13, with E11a and E12a), each stated at the end of its section and listed together at the end. 一个经济位置在什么时候成了别人绕不过去的地方?绕不过去时,那里的人还有没有一条真的路?这一篇在关系一级问这两件事。前六节在泉坳:一家只有十四名员工的水业公司是两个村唯一的自来水,它涨价六成以后对两村发出同一张停水公告;下坳当年经村民大会表决让出了旧井的地块,旧井由公司填平;上坳没有协议,旧井陆续干涸,原因未查明。后三节在青窑镇:一家雇着全镇七成劳动人口的瓷厂,劳动合同里有宿舍、代用券、预支与竞业几条;一位想离开的老窑工实际碰到的,是预支未清时公司不同意他离职,还清以后又被竞业一条挡住,后来由一笔出资解开。全篇立九条。关口是别人维持生活或展开自己的路上绕不过去的位置,有广度与深度两个量,小权力可以很深。停止自身供给分三种读法:未承诺、未载入、未先封路的,停止不构成切断;已承诺或载入的,撤回按它所进的格另核,载入也可以经承认性载入;先封路、致依赖、再撤出的,是切断;三种读法可以在同一安排里并存。已有排他的动手时,解除关闭是停止压缩,不是给予权利。哪些资源算基础权利的内容,规范层只立判据,清单在规则层。强力只在有替代判断时认,落在生命基底上的那一部分要切出来。生命基底处唯一的供给位置持供给的职责,职责有两处来路,管理它的制度或政府持为供给创造条件的职责;职责束缚位置,退出的效力不等于退出的程序。许多项约束合起来可以越线。分叉权是有权选;竞业禁止拿走了人离开以后的选,侵分叉权,带补偿也一样,轻重看它所及多宽;它不落在局部、可逆的限里,本系列对规则层的建议是原则上不为它开允许的口子;为保护他人而设、只限他去侵犯别人目的那一步的约束,不在其列;附条件的给付,三件判据都过时不拿走选,落在规范层给规则层留的空间里。退出真实,守的不只是此刻的人,也是涌现的前提。随文与波兰尼、汤普森(据二手转述)、赫希曼(转引)对照。全篇九条(E7 至 E13,含 E11a、E12a),各节末写出,篇末合列。 Related works Relation Identifier Scheme Resource type Title References 10.5281/zenodo.19328662 DOI Publication / Preprint How Is Institution Possible: From Inter-Ontological Remainder to Co-Constructive Framework (SAE Foundational Paper 6) References 10.5281/zenodo.19358010 DOI Publication / Preprint Four Layers of Economic Rationality: A Diagnostic Extension of the Rational Agent from Dimensional Sequence Theory (SAE Economics, Paper 1) References 10.5281/zenodo.19381666 DOI Publication / Preprint The Other End of the Bridge: Economic Rationality When 15DD Faces a Party Who Does Not Enter 15DD (SAE Economics, Paper 2) References 10.5281/zenodo.19394738 DOI Publication / Preprint The Structural Inevitability of 15DD Emergence in Free Markets: From Baseline Collisions to Perceptual Leap (SAE Economics, Paper 5) References 10.5281/zenodo.20370224 DOI Publication / Preprint On the Origin of Power · Shi (SAE Power Theory, Paper 1) References 10.5281/zenodo.22974154 DOI Publication / Preprint The Place of Judgment (SAE Action Theory, Paper 0) References 10.5281/zenodo.20769253 DOI Publication / Preprint On the Thickness and Boundary of Basic Rights (SAE Rights Theory, Paper 2) References 10.5281/zenodo.21093939 DOI Publication / Preprint The Interface and Transformation between Recognition-Based Rights and Power (SAE Rights Theory, Paper 4) References 10.5281/zenodo.21212595 DOI Publication / Preprint On the Limitation and Violation of Basic Rights (SAE Rights Theory, Paper 5) References 10.5281/zenodo.21314907 DOI Publication / Preprint On Rights and Entitlements (SAE Rights Theory, Specialist Paper) References 10.5281/zenodo.22853810 DOI Publication / Preprint On Accountability · Wei (SAE Rights Theory, Specialist Paper) References 10.5281/zenodo.23269635 DOI Publication / Preprint To Whom the Ought Is Addressed (SAE Institution Theory, Paper 1) References 10.5281/zenodo.23270384 DOI Publication / Preprint Not Crossing the Line (SAE Institution Theory, Paper 2) References 10.5281/zenodo.23271324 DOI Publication / Preprint Open to Questioning (SAE Institution Theory, Paper 6) References 10.5281/zenodo.23413112 DOI Publication / Preprint Guarantee (SAE Theory of Government, Paper 3) References 10.5281/zenodo.23413511 DOI Publication / Preprint Questioning and Bearing (SAE Theory of Government, Paper 6) References 10.5281/zenodo.23815735 DOI Publication / Preprint What Cooperation Is Not (SAE Theory of Inter-State Cooperation, Prequel) References 10.5281/zenodo.23815769 DOI Publication / Preprint Mutual Checks (SAE Theory of Inter-State Cooperation, Paper 4)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han Qin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: