SAE Political Economy · Paper 4: Conversion / SAE 政治经济学 第四篇: 兑换

When what has been accumulated is turned to some other effect, where must a gate be set? This paper names two: accumulation is not converted into domination over people's Base Layer; accumulation is not converted into control over questioning. Several matters in the Kingdom State run through the whole paper: the employment contract of Bluekiln Porcelain Works made departure conditional on the company's consent while the wage advance remained unpaid; Sundial Ratings downgraded Apple City, which had supported a marketplace bill, while one of Sundial's major shareholders at the same time set the direction of Crossways, the company that bill is aimed at; after Crossways bought the review platform Echo Wall, a workshop's score was dragged down by a batch of newly registered accounts, and the record shows only one place of appeal, which gives no reasons; nine members of the Economic Committee of the State Legislature received donations from Crossways, the committee struck out the breakup clause by eight votes to seven, and the division head who had led the review went to Crossways four months after leaving office; Crossways Pay's settlements were delayed by three days, and the state gave it an emergency loan with conditions attached. The first gate stops converting what people need to sustain their lives into control that compresses their life-substrate, and stops using money, housing and the manner of paying wages to place people's ability to leave, refuse or revoke a standing bond under another party's control; a signature does not change this reading. The second gate stops the party questioned from acquiring a standing in which it can on its own close off questioning, correction or delivery; channels of questioning may have responsible positions; the account does not belong to the party whose accounts are kept, nor to any single keeper of accounts; shareholding and fee relations do not in themselves settle the matter, and the judgment lies in structure. Political–economic separation runs in both directions, and is the extreme case of the second gate at the level of public power: money does not buy that share of political power which reviews and questions it, and decisions made in a position are not cashed in, either, as wealth later obtained from the party the position questioned; donation, employment and purchase do not stand in for each other's verdict. Outside the two gates, exchange in the Emergence Layer is left open as usual; not running into the two gates does not certify the rest. Public support obtained through structural dependence is not an endorsement: the party that gives the support must explain, and the party that receives it is questioned as usual. Three interfaces are made in place: at political–economic separation, a sentence of Smith on legislative proposals from dealers (confirmed in the original); Walzer's "blocked exchanges" and Sandel's two objections concerning the limits of markets, both relied on only through secondary summaries, with the points of comparison listed and no conclusion drawn as to whether they stand together or apart. The paper has five propositions (E21 to E25), each stated at the end of its section and listed together at the end. 积累起来的东西换成别的作用时,哪里要设闸?这一篇说两道:积累不兑换为对人的基础层的支配;积累不兑换为对追问的控制。全篇以王国州的几件事贯穿:青窑瓷业的劳动合同把一笔预支换成了对离职的同意;日晷评级下调了支持一部市集法的苹果城,而它的一个大股东同时定着那部法所针对的通衢的方向;通衢买下点评平台回音壁以后,一家作坊的评分被一批新注册的账号拉下,记载里的申诉只有一处、不说理由;州议会经济委员会里九人受了通衢的捐款,委员会以八票对七票删去了拆分一款,主持审查的处长离任四个月后到了通衢;通衢支付结算延迟三日,州给了它一笔附条件的紧急贷款。第一道闸挡的是把人维持生活所必需的东西换成压缩其生命基底的控制,以及拿钱、住处与工资的发放方式去锁住人的离开、拒绝与撤回;签了字也不改这一读。第二道闸挡的是被问的一方取得独自关闭追问、纠错或兑现的地位;问的通道可以有负责的位置,账不归被记账的一方,也不归任何单一的记账者;股权与收费关系本身不定案,判在结构。政经分离是双向的,是第二道闸在公共权力一级的极端情形:钱不买成审它、问它的那份政治权力,位置上作出的决定也不变现为日后从被它问过的一方拿到的财富;捐赠、受聘与买卖不互相代判。两道闸以外,涌现层的交换照常放开;没有撞上两道闸,也不认证其余。结构依赖换来的公共支持不作背书:作出支持的一方要说明,接受支持的一方照常受问。随文三处对接:政经分离处接上斯密论经营者的立法提议一句(原文核到);沃尔泽的"受阻的交换"、桑德尔对市场限度的两种反对,两处都只据二手转述,列出可对照之处,不作同在、分在的结论。全篇五条(E21 至 E25),各节末写出,篇末合列。 Related works Relation Identifier Scheme Resource type Title References 10.5281/zenodo.19328662 DOI Publication / Preprint How Is Institution Possible: From Inter-Ontological Remainder to Co-Constructive Framework (SAE Foundational Paper 6) References 10.5281/zenodo.21093939 DOI Publication / Preprint The Interface and Transformation between Recognition-Based Rights and Power (SAE Rights Theory, Paper 4) References 10.5281/zenodo.21212595 DOI Publication / Preprint On the Limitation and Violation of Basic Rights (SAE Rights Theory, Paper 5) References 10.5281/zenodo.21252863 DOI Publication / Preprint On the Cultivation and Diachronic Unfolding of Rights (SAE Rights Theory, Paper 6) References 10.5281/zenodo.20046168 DOI Publication / Preprint The Reputation Economy · Dao (SAE Moral Law, Paper 3) References 10.5281/zenodo.23269635 DOI Publication / Preprint To Whom the Ought Is Addressed (SAE Institution Theory, Paper 1) References 10.5281/zenodo.23270384 DOI Publication / Preprint Not Crossing the Line (SAE Institution Theory, Paper 2) References 10.5281/zenodo.23271324 DOI Publication / Preprint Open to Questioning (SAE Institution Theory, Paper 6) References 10.5281/zenodo.23413112 DOI Publication / Preprint Guarantee (SAE Theory of Government, Paper 3) References 10.5281/zenodo.23413511 DOI Publication / Preprint Questioning and Bearing (SAE Theory of Government, Paper 6)