Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: to examine how workload and work environment affect employee performance in service-sector companies in Indonesia. Method: this study employed a quantitative survey approach involving 117 employees from service-sector companies in West Java, Indonesia, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire with a seven-point Likert scale and analyzed using regression analysis, including validity, reliability, collinearity, and hypothesis testing. Findings: workload and work environment have positive and significant effects on employee performance. Workload emerges as a stronger predictor than work environment, while both variables collectively explain a substantial proportion of variations in employee performance. These results highlight the importance of balanced workload distribution and a conducive work environment in improving employee performance in Indonesia's service sector. Implications: organizations should optimize workload distribution according to employee competencies and improve physical and non-physical workplace conditions to strengthen employee performance, productivity, and organizational effectiveness. Originality: lies in providing empirical evidence on the relationships between workload, work environment, and employee performance by integrating job demands–resources theory in the context of service-sector companies in West Java, Indonesia, and highlighting the complementary roles of job demands and workplace resources in supporting employee performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rifa’i et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: