Why the study?
Sex-based morphological, physiological, and baseline characteristic differences may impact outcomes between sexes after TAVR.
Do outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) differ between female and male patients?
Meta-Analysis (n=657,850)
Do outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) differ between female and male patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients undergoing TAVR, females face higher short-term risks including in-hospital mortality, stroke, and bleeding, but have lower 1-year all-cause mortality compared to males.
Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an effective treatment for symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). Sex-based morphological and physiological differences may influence TAVR outcomes. These differences and variations in baseline characteristics may impact outcomes after TAVR between the sexes. Purpose This meta-analysis aimed to compare sex-related outcomes in over half a million patients undergoing TAVR and assess the influence of baseline characteristics via meta-regression analysis. Results The meta-analysis included 58 studies with 657,850 patients (351,927 males; 305,923 females). Females were older (81.3 vs. 80.2 years; p <0.01) with better LVEF%, while males had more comorbidities. Meta-analysis of primary outcomes showed that females had higher in-hospital mortality (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02–1.32; p = 0.02, I² = 76%) but lower 1-year mortality (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82–0.93; p < 0.01, I² = 44%). No sex differences were observed in 30-day mortality (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95–1.10; p = 0.52, I² = 5%) or cardiovascular mortality at 30 days (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.92–1.18; p = 0.56, I² = 0%) and 1 year (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.92–1.29; p = 0.31, I² = 26%). Meta-regression identified confounders (e.g., age, hypertension,heart failure with New Work Heart Association (NYHA) III/IV, prior stroke, prior atrial fibrillation, Prior percutaneous coronary intervention, prior pacemaker and valve type) explaining heterogeneity in in-hospital mortality. Females had higher risks of major bleeding (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.16–1.41; p < 0.01, I² = 79%), vascular complications (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.25–1.62; p < 0.01, I² = 69%), and stroke (in-hospital: RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.15–1.37; p < 0.01, I² = 40%; 30-day: RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07–1.44; p < 0.01, I² = 0%). Conversely, acute kidney injury (AKI) was less frequent in females (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86–0.97; p < 0.01, I² = 54%). Conclusion Our meta-analysis, the largest and most comprehensive of its kind, reveals that females face higher short-term risks (in-hospital mortality, stroke, bleeding, vascular complications), while males have higher 1-year mortality and AKI. Despite lower 1-year mortality, females show no difference in 1-year cardiovascular mortality, suggesting their survival advantage may reflect longer life expectancy rather than TAVR effects. Peri-procedural care for females should be enhanced, and sex-specific TAVR treatment guidelines are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Benhammou et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) (n=657,850). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on in-hospital mortality (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32, p=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: