Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite promising advantages such as low cost and portability of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), it has yet to be widely implemented outside of basic research. Specifically, fNIRS has yet to be proven as a standalone tool within a clinical setting. The objective of this study was to assess hemodynamic concentration changes at the primary and premotor motor cortices as a result of simple whole-hand grasping and sequential finger-opposition (tapping) tasks. These tasks were repeated over 3 days in a randomized manner. Ten healthy young adults ([Formula: see text]) participated in the study. Quantitatively, no statistically significant differences were discovered between the levels of activation for the two motor tasks ([Formula: see text]). Overall, the signals were consistent across all 3 days. The findings show that both finger-opposition and hand grasping can be used interchangeably in fNIRS for assessment of motor function which would be useful in further advancing techniques for clinical implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kashou et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: