Key result
Fat-free mass-adjusted peak VO2 <19 linked to ~402% higher 1-year hospitalization risk in HF patients.
Why the study?
Traditional peak oxygen uptake scaling using total body weight may underestimate cardiorespiratory fitness due to adiposity, and the prognostic value of fat-free mass-adjusted peak VO2 remains unclear.
Does fat-free mass-adjusted peak VO2 provide incremental prognostic value over total body weight-adjusted peak VO2 for predicting 1-year hospitalization in Asian patients with heart failure?
Cohort (n=83)
No
Does fat-free mass-adjusted peak VO2 provide incremental prognostic value over total body weight-adjusted peak VO2 for predicting 1-year hospitalization in Asian patients with heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fat-free mass-adjusted peak VO2 provides incremental prognostic value over traditional total body weight-adjusted peak VO2 for predicting 1-year hospitalization in Asian patients with heart failure.
Purpose: Reduced cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is associated with hospitalization risk in heart failure (HF).Traditional peak oxygen uptake (VO2) scaling uses total body weight (TBW), potentially underestimating CRF due to adiposity.The prognostic value of fat-free mass (FFM)-adjusted peak VO remains unclear, particularly in Asian populations.Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study included HF patients who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing and bioelectrical impedance analysis.Two peak VO cutoffs-14 mL/TBW kg/min and 19 mL/FFM kg/min-were applied to predict all-cause and HF-specific 1-year hospitalization.The prognostic performance was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score.Likelihood ratio tests were conducted to evaluate the incremental value of adding the FFM-adjusted cutoff.Results: A total of 83 patients (mean age, 60.0 years; 14 female; 37 obese) were analyzed.Both TBW-and FFM-adjusted cutoffs were significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause hospitalization [hazard ratio (HR)=3.86,95% confidence interval (CI), 1.40-10.63vs. HR=5.02,95% CI, 1.98-12.72]and HF-specific hospitalization (HR=4.00,95% CI, 1.00-16.05vs. HR=7.26,95% CI, 1.92-27.46).Adding the FFM-adjusted cutoff significantly improved model fit when added to a model with the TBW-adjusted cutoff (p<0.05).The difference in c-indices between the two cutoffs after bootstrapping was not statistically significant. Conclusion:The FFM-adjusted cutoff can complement the traditional TBW-adjusted cutoff by correcting the confounding bias of excessive adiposity or low muscle mass, providing incremental prognostic value for risk stratification in Asian patients with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=83). Fat-free mass (FFM)-adjusted peak VO2 cutoff (<19 mL/FFM kg/min) vs. FFM-adjusted peak VO2 ≥19 mL/FFM kg/min was evaluated on 1-year all-cause hospitalization (HR 5.02, 95% CI 1.98-12.72, p=0.001). A fat-free mass-adjusted peak VO2 cutoff of <19 mL/FFM kg/min was significantly associated with an increased risk of 1-year all-cause hospitalization (HR 5.02) in patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: