Key result
Late potentials abolition is linked to ~63% lower VT recurrence in patients with infarct-related CTO.
Why the study?
Does late potentials abolition reduce ventricular tachycardia recurrence in patients with prior myocardial infarction undergoing VT ablation, particularly those with an infarct-related artery chronic total occlusion?
Population
84 patients with prior myocardial infarction and clinical ventricular tachycardia, referred for VT ablation…
Comparison
Late potentials abolition during substrate… vs No late potentials abolition
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
May support LP targeting in IRA-CTO VT ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Observational (n=84)
No
Does late potentials abolition reduce ventricular tachycardia recurrence in patients with prior myocardial infarction undergoing VT ablation, particularly those with an infarct-related artery chronic total occlusion?
Absolute Event Rate: 24% vs 65%
p-value: p=0.005
Late potentials abolition during VT ablation significantly reduces VT recurrence, particularly in high-risk patients with a chronic total occlusion in an infarct-related artery.
Marco et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Prior myocardial infarction and clinical ventricular tachycardia (n=84). Late potentials (LP) abolition vs. No LP abolition was evaluated on Ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence after ablation (p=0.005). Late potentials abolition significantly reduced ventricular tachycardia recurrence compared to no abolition among high-risk patients with an infarct-related artery CTO (24% vs. 65%, P=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: