Key result
BTL ambulatory BP monitor meets ISO validation criteria with ~0.5 mmHg systolic mean difference.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to validate the BTL ambulatory blood pressure monitoring NG device in a general population, including children aged 4-12 years, according to ISO 81060-2:2018 with amendments A1:2020 and A2:2024.
Is the BTL ambulatory blood pressure monitoring NG device accurate for blood pressure measurement in adults and children according to ISO standards?
Observational (n=120)
Is the BTL ambulatory blood pressure monitoring NG device accurate for blood pressure measurement in adults and children according to ISO standards?
The BTL ambulatory blood pressure monitoring NG device is valid and accurate for use in both adults and children according to the latest ISO 81060-2:2018 standards.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the BTL ambulatory blood pressure monitoring NG ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring device in a general population, including children aged 4-12 years, according to the International Organization for Standardization 81060-2:2018 standard with amendments A1:2020 and A2:2024. METHODS: The study included both clinical and ambulatory validation. In the clinical part, 85 participants (50 adults and 35 children) underwent same-arm sequential measurements with alternating test device and reference readings. The ambulatory part involved 35 adults tested using a dynamic protocol on a bicycle ergometer with at least a 15% heart rate increase. All procedures strictly followed standard requirements, including arm circumference and BP distributions. RESULTS: The device met all validation criteria defined by the standard. In clinical testing, mean differences were -0.52 mmHg systolic and -0.39 mmHg diastolic, with standard deviations of 4.44 and 4.17 mmHg. All cuff subgroups also met criterion 1, and criterion 2 was fulfilled with standard deviations of 3.80 mmHg systolic and 3.35 mmHg diastolic, including the children subgroup. In the ambulatory validation, mean differences were -0.40 mmHg systolic and -0.50 mmHg diastolic, with standard deviations of 5.88 and 5.05 mmHg. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first published validation of an ambulatory BP monitoring device that fully followed the unified 81060-2:2018 standard, including amendments A1:2020 and A2:2024. The device fulfilled all clinical and ambulatory validation criteria across all required distributions and age groups, including children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David et al. (2025) conducted an observational in General population (n=120). BTL ambulatory blood pressure monitoring NG device vs. Reference readings was evaluated on Validation criteria defined by the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard (Mean difference -0.52 mmHg systolic, -0.39 mmHg diastolic). The BTL ambulatory blood pressure monitoring NG device met all ISO 81060-2:2018 validation criteria, demonstrating clinical mean differences of -0.52 mmHg systolic and -0.39 mmHg diastolic.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: