Key result
The MediGuide 3D cardiovascular navigation system significantly reduced fluoroscopy time (52 vs 129 sec, P<0.001) and radiation exposure during LV lead implants in canines.
Why the study?
Does MediGuide-guided LV lead implantation reduce fluoroscopy duration and radiation exposure compared to conventional implantation in canines?
Does MediGuide-guided LV lead implantation reduce fluoroscopy duration and radiation exposure compared to conventional implantation in canines?
Absolute Event Rate: 52% vs 129%
p-value: p=<0.001
The MediGuide 3D navigation system significantly reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure during LV lead implantation in a canine model.
Supports evaluation of navigation systems to minimize radiation in CRT; leaves open translation from canine models to patients.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy implants entail significant radiation exposure for patients and physicians. A novel 3D electromagnetic cardiovascular navigation system (MediGuide™) was designed to superimpose the real-time location of sensors embedded in delivery tools on prerecorded coronary sinus (CS) venograms while adjusting for patient movement and variations in heart rate under different C-arm angulations. We studied the accuracy and efficacy of MediGuide™ in reducing radiation exposure during LV lead implants. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fluoroscopy durations and radiation exposures were measured in 6 canines undergoing both conventional and MediGuide™-guided LV lead implants. The in vivo accuracy of MediGuide™ was evaluated by obtaining CS venograms at 3 different C-arm angulations at 3 different heart rates and measuring the separation between the projected sensor icon of a MediGuide™ sensor-enabled guidewire and the encompassing branch on prerecorded venograms. RESULTS: Mediguide™-guided implants resulted in significant reductions in fluoroscopy time (52 ± 120 [median 6] vs 129 ± 118 [median 90] sec, P < 0.001) and radiation exposure (13.8 ± 32.4 [median 1.7] vs 49.2 ± 45.3 [median 27.2] μGym(2) , P = 0.03) compared to conventional implants. LV lead delivery time was not significantly different between the 2 implant techniques (P = 0.27). The mean separation between the projected guidewire sensor icon and its encompassing branch was 0.48 ± 0.94 (median 0.00) mm. System accuracy was not affected by variations in heart rate or C-arm angulations. CONCLUSION: The novel 3D cardiovascular navigation system enabled accurate and reliable tracking of sensor-enabled tools at varying heart rates and C-arm angulations with minimal need for fluoroscopy guidance, significantly reducing fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valderrábano et al. (2013) studied Left Ventricular Lead Implant (n=6). MediGuide 3D cardiovascular navigation system vs. Conventional implant was evaluated on Fluoroscopy duration (seconds) (p=<0.001). The MediGuide 3D cardiovascular navigation system significantly reduced fluoroscopy time (52 vs 129 sec, P<0.001) and radiation exposure during LV lead implants in canines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: