Key result
High pre-procedural platelet/lymphocyte ratio predicts no-reflow after primary PCI in STEMI.
Why the study?
Coronary no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI is linked to poor outcomes and involves deregulated inflammation, prompting investigation into the relationship between platelet/lymphocyte ratio and no-reflow after PPCI.
Does pre-procedural platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) predict the coronary no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cohort (n=200)
Does pre-procedural platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) predict the coronary no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elevated pre-procedural platelet/lymphocyte ratio and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction are independent predictors of the no-reflow phenomenon following primary PCI in acute STEMI patients, helping identify those who may benefit from prophylactic therapy.
Background: Coronary no-reflow phenomenon in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with a poor clinical outcome. Although its pathophysiology is not fully understood, a deregulated systemic inflammatory response plays an important role. We aimed to explore the relationship between platelet ratio (PLR) and no-reflow in patients with acute STEMI who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods: A total of 200 patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI were included in the study. Transthoracic echocardiographic examination was performed to assess left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and wall motion score index. Blood samples were assayed for platelet and lymphocyte count before primary PCI. No-reflow was defined as coronary blood flow TIMI grade ≤ II. Results: No-reflow was observed in 58 (29%) of STEMI patients following PPCI. PLR was significantly higher in hypertensive patients compared to normotensive patients (144.7 ± 91.6 vs. 109.1 ± 47.1, respectively, P < 0.001) and in the no-reflow group compared to the normal reflow group (214 ± 93 vs. 101.6 ± 51.3, respectively, P < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that PLR (β: 0.485, 95% CI: -0.006 - 0.001, P < 0.002) and LV ejection fraction (β: 0.272, 95% CI: 0.009 - 0.034, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of no-reflow after primary PCI. Conclusion: Pre-procedural increase in PLR is predictive of the no-reflow phenomenon following primary PCI in STEMI patients. Relevance for patients: No reflow phenomenon is an unfavorable complication following primary PCI in patients with acute STEMI. High pre-procedural PLR is an independent predictor of reperfusion failure and helps to identify patients who require prophylactic treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Badran et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) managed with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n=200). Pre-procedural platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR) vs. Normal reflow (TIMI flow > II) was evaluated on Coronary no-reflow phenomenon (defined as coronary blood flow TIMI grade ≤ II following primary PCI) (β 0.485, 95% CI -0.006 to 0.001, p=<0.002). Pre-procedural platelet/lymphocyte ratio was higher in STEMI patients with no-reflow after primary PCI than normal reflow and independently predicted it.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: