Why the study?
Does single-dose prophylaxis with clindamycin or cefazolin reduce wound infection rates in patients undergoing appendicectomy?
Does single-dose prophylaxis with clindamycin or cefazolin reduce wound infection rates in patients undergoing appendicectomy?
A single preoperative dose of clindamycin significantly reduces wound infection rates after appendicectomy, highlighting the importance of anaerobic organisms in pathogenesis.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Two hundred and fifty patients were admitted to a prospective randomized trial of single dosage prophylaxis against wound infection after appendicectomy. There were 12 exclusions, 72 patients received placebo, 81 received 600 mg i.m. clindamycin phosphate and 85 received 1 1 g i.m. cefazolin sodium, the agent being given in the anaesthetic room. Clindamycin produced a significant reduction in the overall rate of wound infection from 33 per cent in the controls to 17 per cent. In cases with a gangrenous or perforated appendix the infection rate in controls was 78 per cent; this was reduced to 44 per cent by a single dose of clindamycin. Cefazolin significantly reduced the number of aerobic organisms isolated from wound infections, but did not significantly reduce the incidence of wound infection. We conclude that anaerobic organisms are more important than faecal aerobic organisms in the pathogenesis of wound infection after appendicectomy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single-dose clindamycin prophylaxis should be adopted for appendicectomy; confirms anaerobic coverage as key to lowering surgical site infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donovan et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: