Why the study?
Does pacing-induced experimental congestive heart failure increase cardiac Cardiotrophin-1 expression in a canine model?
Does pacing-induced experimental congestive heart failure increase cardiac Cardiotrophin-1 expression in a canine model?
Cardiac production of Cardiotrophin-1 is augmented in experimental congestive heart failure and correlates with left ventricular hypertrophy, suggesting a role in structural remodeling.
Augmented CT-1 in experimental CHF suggests hypertrophic role; hypothesis-generating for human remodeling.
BACKGROUND: Cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1) is a potent hypertrophic factor discovered by coupling expression cloning in a mouse embryonic stem cell-based model of cardiogenesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present study was designed to investigate the potential activation of atrial and ventricular CT-1 expression in pacing-induced experimental congestive heart failure (CHF) and its relationship to left ventricular hypertrophy by the method of Northern blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. We used a canine model of pacing-induced experimental CHF based on hemodynamic and neurohumoral characteristics that closely mimic human dilated cardiomyopathy. Northern blot analysis demonstrated that CT-1 gene expression was present in normal atrium and ventricle and was increased in CHF hearts. There was a positive correlation between ventricular CT-1 mRNA and left ventricular mass index. Immunohistochemistry revealed positive immunostaining in the atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes from both normal and CHF hearts. CT-1 immunoreactivity was more intense in the atrium and ventricle from CHF hearts than in normal hearts. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that both atrium and ventricle synthesize CT-1 and that cardiac production of CT-1 is augmented in a canine model of experimental CHF. This study also demonstrates that ventricular CT-1 mRNA correlates with left ventricular hypertrophy, suggesting that CT-1 plays an important role in the structural remodeling that characterizes CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jougasaki et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: