Why the study?
Are angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphisms associated with human essential hypertension?
Are angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene polymorphisms associated with human essential hypertension?
The C1166 polymorphism of the AT1 receptor gene is associated with essential hypertension, suggesting a common variant imparting a small effect on blood pressure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AT1 receptor variants may contribute to hypertension risk; hypothesis-generating association requires validation before any clinical consideration.
We conducted the present study to determine whether the angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1) gene might be implicated in human essential hypertension by using case-control and linkage studies. The entire coding and 3' untranslated regions of the AT1 receptor gene (2.2 kb) were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and submitted to single-strand conformation polymorphism in 60 hypertensive subjects with a familial susceptibility. We identified five polymorphisms (T573-->C, A1062-->G, A1166-->C, G1517-->T, and A1878-->G). However, no mutations that alter the encoded amino acid sequence were detected. A case-control study performed on white hypertensive (n = 206; blood pressure, 168 +/- 16/103 +/- 9 mm Hg) and normotensive (n = 298; blood pressure, 122 +/- 10/75 +/- 9 mm Hg) subjects using three of five polymorphisms showed a significant increase in allelic frequency of C1166 in hypertensive subjects (0.36 versus 0.28 for normotensive subjects, chi 2 = 6.8, P < .01). Frequencies for the alleles of the other two polymorphisms (T573-->C, A1878-->G) were similar in both groups. We performed a linkage study using the affected sib pair method and a highly polymorphic marker of the AT1 receptor gene. There was no evidence for linkage in 267 sib pairs analyzed from 138 pedigrees. These findings would be compatible with a common variant of the AT1 receptor imparting a small effect on blood pressure; further studies will be needed to address this possibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonnardeaux et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: