Key result
Verapamil protected the myocardium of genetically cardiomyopathic hamsters against structural damage and preserved myocardial contractility compared to saline.
Why the study?
Does verapamil reduce myocardial damage and preserve contractility in cardiomyopathic Syrian hamsters?
Does verapamil reduce myocardial damage and preserve contractility in cardiomyopathic Syrian hamsters?
Verapamil protects against structural damage and preserves myocardial contractility in a genetic hamster model of cardiomyopathy.
Hypothesis-generating in hamster cardiomyopathy; leaves open clinical translation to human disease.
We attempted to alter the inherited myocardial damage and loss of contractility of the cardiomyopathic Syrian hamster (strain U-MX7-1) by giving cardiac drugs that altered intracellular calcium and myocardial workload. Thirty-seven 21-day-old cardiomyopathic and thirty-seven 21-day-old normal hamsters were divided into five groups each: verapamil-, propranolol-, digoxin-, hydralazine-, and saline-injected. On their 90th day of life, the hamsters were killed. Of the five cardiomyopathic groups, only verapamil reduced myocardial damage. When both "control" and cardiomyopathic hamsters were treated with saline, digoxin, or propranolol, the cardiomyopathic hamsters had significantly less contractile force, maximal rate of force development, and maximum velocity of unloaded shortening. When both groups were treated with verapamil or hydralazine, there were no significant group differences in the indices of contractility. However, when saline-treated cardiomyopathic hamsters were compared with drug-treated cardiomyopathic hamsters, only verapamil preserved myocardial contractility. There was also a weak correlation between the Vmax and the actin-activated ATPase activity of the cardiomyopathic hamsters (r = 0.63, P less than 0.001). We conclude that verapamil helped protect the myocardium of genetically cardiomyopathic hamsters against structural damage, and helped preserve myocardial contractility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rouleau et al. (1982) studied Hereditary cardiomyopathy (n=74). Verapamil vs. Saline, propranolol, digoxin, or hydralazine was evaluated on Myocardial damage and contractility. Verapamil protected the myocardium of genetically cardiomyopathic hamsters against structural damage and preserved myocardial contractility compared to saline.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: