Key result
Female sex was associated with a higher risk of heart failure (HR 1.51) but a lower risk of atrial fibrillation (HR 0.74) and ventricular arrhythmia (HR 0.60) compared to male sex in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
Women with HCM present at a more advanced disease stage and face higher risks of heart failure and death, but contributing factors remain unclear.
Are there sex differences in clinical and genetic factors associated with adverse outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=6,647)
Yes
Are there sex differences in clinical and genetic factors associated with adverse outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Hazard Ratio: 1.51 (95% CI 1.21–1.88)
p-value: p=0.0003
Clinical and genetic factors, including sarcomere mutations and MYBPC3 variants, affect the risk of adverse outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy differently in women compared to men.
Sex-specific outcome risks in HCM may inform monitoring; leaves open whether sarcomere variants drive differences.
Background Women with HCM present at a more advanced stage of the disease and have a higher risk of heart failure and death. The factors contributing to these differences are unclear. We aimed to investigate sex differences in clinical and genetic factors associated with adverse outcomes in the Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry (SHaRe). Methods Cox proportional hazard models were fit with a sex interaction term to determine if significant sex differences existed in the association between risk factors and outcomes. Models were fit separately for women and men to find the sex-specific hazard ratio. Results After a mean follow-up of 6.4 years, women had a higher risk of heart failure (HR 1.51; 95% CI 1.21-1.88, p=0.0003) but a lower risk of atrial fibrillation (0.74; 0.59-0.93; p<0.0001) and ventricular arrhythmia (0.60; 0.38-0.94; p=0.027) than men. No sex difference was observed for death (p=0.84). Sarcomere-positive men had a higher risk of heart failure and death, not seen in women (p-heterogeneity=0.006 & p-heterogeneity=0.035, respectively). MYBPC3 variants were associated with lower heart failure risk in women than other HCM subgroups, with no significant change for men (p-heterogeneity <0.0001). Women with moderate risk of ventricular arrhythmia (4% to <6% ESC risk score) were at a higher risk of ventricular arrhythmia than those scoring <4%, not observed in men (p-heterogeneity= 0.019). Conclusion Clinical and genetic factors contributing to adverse outcomes in HCM affect women and men differently. Research to inform sex-specific management of HCM could improve outcomes for both sexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butters et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=6,647). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Heart failure composite (first occurrence of cardiac transplantation, LV assist device implantation, or NYHA functional class III-IV symptoms) (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.21-1.88, p=0.0003). Female sex was associated with a higher risk of heart failure (HR 1.51) but a lower risk of atrial fibrillation (HR 0.74) and ventricular arrhythmia (HR 0.60) compared to male sex in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: