Key result
Quadripolar left ventricular leads in CRT-D patients were associated with lower rates of hospitalization for heart failure or lead revision compared to bipolar leads (IRR 0.46; P=0.04).
Why the study?
Does a quadripolar LV lead reduce post-implant hospitalizations and costs compared to a bipolar LV lead in patients receiving de novo CRT-D implants?
Population
193 consecutive patients receiving de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator implants at a…
Comparison
Quadripolar (QUAD) left ventricular (LV) lead vs Bipolar (BIP) left ventricular (LV) lead
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
Enrolled between January 2009 and December 2012, followed…
Authors
Loading...
Should not yet change CRT-D lead selection; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of benefit.
Observational (n=193)
No
Does a quadripolar LV lead reduce post-implant hospitalizations and costs compared to a bipolar LV lead in patients receiving de novo CRT-D implants?
Relative Risk: 0.46
Absolute Event Rate: 0.15% vs 0.32%
p-value: p=0.04
Quadripolar LV leads for CRT-D are associated with significantly lower rates of HF or lead revision hospitalizations and reduced healthcare costs compared to bipolar leads.
Forleo et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Heart failure requiring CRT-D (n=193). Quadripolar (QUAD) left ventricular lead vs. Bipolar (BIP) left ventricular lead was evaluated on Post-implant hospitalizations related to heart failure (HF) or LV lead surgical revision (IRR 0.46, p=0.04). Quadripolar left ventricular leads in CRT-D patients were associated with lower rates of hospitalization for heart failure or lead revision compared to bipolar leads (IRR 0.46; P=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: