Why the study?
Does low-dose subcutaneous heparin prevent deep vein thrombosis and non-fatal pulmonary embolus in patients aged over 40 undergoing major elective intra-abdominal surgery?
Does low-dose subcutaneous heparin prevent deep vein thrombosis and non-fatal pulmonary embolus in patients aged over 40 undergoing major elective intra-abdominal surgery?
Low-dose subcutaneous heparin (5000 IU eight-hourly) reduces calf-vein thrombosis but fails to prevent proximal segment thrombosis or non-fatal pulmonary embolism in patients over 40 undergoing major abdominal surgery.
Low-dose heparin fails to prevent proximal DVT or nonfatal PE; challenges its routine use for comprehensive VTE prophylaxis after major abdominal surgery.
The efficacy of low-dose subcutaneous heparin (5000 IU eight-hourly) is being studied in a single-centre, prospective randomised trial of patients aged over 40 submitted to major elective intra-abdominal surgery. The trial end-points are the objectively defined incidence and extent of deep vein thrombosis (as seen on uptake of 125I-labelled fibrinogen, Doppler ultrasonography, and bilateral ascending phlebography) and non-fatal pulmonary embolus (as measured by preoperative spirometry and preoperative and postoperative chest radiography and perfusion lung scanning performed on a routine, unselected basis). An interim analysis of the first 200 patients indicates that low-dose heparin significantly reduces the incidence of calf-vein thrombosis but does not reduce the incidence of proximal segment thrombosis or non-fatal pulmonary embolism. Thus the routine use of low-dose heparin prophylaxis in all major surgical procedures in patients aged over 40 may not be advisable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1979 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: