Why the study?
A new generation of therapeutic devices has expanded options for managing advanced heart failure, prompting examination of cardiac contractility therapy outcomes in chronic heart failure.
Does cardiac contractility modulation therapy improve physical function and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does cardiac contractility modulation therapy improve physical function and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Cardiac contractility modulation therapy appears to improve left ventricular ejection fraction, functional capacity, and reduce hospital admissions in a small cohort of patients with chronic heart failure.
Cardiac contractility modulation merits larger trials in chronic HF; leaves open its clinical role pending randomized data.
BACKGROUND: A new generation of therapeutic devices has expanded the options for managing advanced heart failure. We examined the outcomes of cardiac contractility therapy in a series of 10 patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS: Ten patients with chronic heart failure were nonrandomly selected to receive cardiac contractility modulation therapy. Hemodynamics, left ventricular ejection fraction, functional capacity, and clinical outcomes were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months of therapy. RESULTS: Eight male and 2 female patients (mean [SD] age, 63.4 [9.4] years) received cardiac contractility modulation therapy. Between baseline and 6-month follow-up, mean (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 27.1% (4.18%) to 35.1% (9.89%), New York Heart Association class declined from 3.9 (0.32) to 2.44 (0.52), and 6-minute walk test distance increased from 159.2 (93.79) m to 212.4 (87.24) m. Furthermore, the mean (SD) number of hospital admissions within the 6 months before cardiac contractility modulation therapy was 2.4 (2.27) compared with 1 (1.52) during the 6 months after therapy. CONCLUSION: Cardiac contractility modulation therapy improved physical functioning and reduced hospital admissions in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vartanian et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: