Why the study?
Does endothelin alter coronary artery diameter and blood flow in conscious dogs?
Does endothelin alter coronary artery diameter and blood flow in conscious dogs?
Endothelin produces a biphasic response of dilation followed by constriction in coronary arteries when administered as a bolus, but only vasoconstriction during continuous infusion, requiring higher than expected circulating levels for significant cardiovascular effects.
Endothelin coronary effects depend on administration kinetics in dogs; leaves open applicability to human disease.
This study examined the effects of endothelin on coronary circulation and the relationship between the plasma concentration of endothelin and cardiovascular function in conscious dogs. The injection of a low dose (50 ng/kg) of endothelin increased coronary artery diameter by 2.17 +/- 0.49% and then decreased coronary artery diameter by 1.13 +/- 0.17% (P less than 0.01) from 3.51 +/- 0.14 mm. This dose increased coronary blood flow by 39 +/- 8.5% and then decreased coronary blood flow by 14 +/- 3.5% (P less than 0.01) from 25 +/- 1.6 ml/min, respectively. Four doses of endothelin (1, 10, 20, and 50 ng.kg-1.min-1) were infused for 20 min each as a cumulative dose response and blood samples were taken to assay endothelin. Significant changes in systemic and coronary dynamics were observed at infusions of 10 and 20 ng.kg-1.min-1. For instance, at 10 ng.kg-1.min-1 there was a significant (P less than 0.05) increase in mean arterial pressure (10 +/- 2.7%), left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic (32 +/- 11%), and LV systolic (8 +/- 3%) pressures and late diastolic coronary resistance (12 +/- 3.0%). This was accompanied by a reduction in large coronary artery diameter (2.0 +/- 0.5%) and coronary blood flow (22 +/- 6.0%; P less than 0.05). At this infusion rate, plasma endothelin reached 70 pg/ml when compared with a control value of 4 +/- 1 pg/ml. Thus the bolus injections of endothelin evoked a biphasic response of large and small coronary arteries, whereas during infusion we observed only vasoconstriction. The levels of circulating endothelin necessary to cause significant cardiovascular effects are much higher than expected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: