Why the study?
Does elevated pre-treatment PAI-1 level predict atrial arrhythmias and in-hospital mortality in AMI patients treated with streptokinase?
Does elevated pre-treatment PAI-1 level predict atrial arrhythmias and in-hospital mortality in AMI patients treated with streptokinase?
Elevated pre-treatment PAI-1 levels (>7 U/ml) predict the development of atrial arrhythmias, which in turn are associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality in AMI patients treated with streptokinase.
Elevated PAI-1 was associated with atrial arrhythmias and higher mortality in streptokinase-treated AMI; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Atrial arrhythmias (AA), especially atrial fibrillation (AF), during acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are often associated with increased mortality and heart failure. Impaired fibrinolysis with elevated plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity is associated with resistance to fibrinolytic therapy in AMI patients, but it is also found in patients with AF. Our aim was a prospective study of the role of pre-treatment PAI-1 levels for the presence of AA in AMI patients and the influence of AA on in-hospital mortality. In 116 AMI patients, treated with streptokinase, pre-treatment PAI-1 levels were estimated by the chromogenic method (normal levels, 0.3-3.5 U/ml) and in-hospital AA were assessed as atrial fibrillation, flutter and/or tachycardias. Between patients with and without AA, a significant difference was observed in mean pre-treatment PAI-1 levels, in several in-hospital complications and mortality (24 versus 4.4%; P < 0.01; odds ratio, 6.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-25.0). The PAI-1 level > 7 U/ml was the most significant independent pre-treatment risk factor for AA (P < 0.05; odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-10.6). We conclude that AA were a significant risk for in-hospital mortality of AMI patients, treated with streptokinase. A pre-treatment PAI-1 level > 7 U/ml was the most significant pre-treatment risk for AA in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andreja Sinkovič (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: