Key result
Multi-leaf collimator tracking significantly improved dosimetric accuracy in AF STAR experiments, reducing the average 2%/2 mm γ-failure rate from 13.1% to 5.9% (p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Does multi-leaf collimator tracking improve dosimetric accuracy in stereotactic arrhythmic radioablation for atrial fibrillation compared to no tracking?
Does multi-leaf collimator tracking improve dosimetric accuracy in stereotactic arrhythmic radioablation for atrial fibrillation compared to no tracking?
MLC tracking significantly improves dosimetric accuracy and target dose coverage in experimental models of stereotactic arrhythmic radioablation for atrial fibrillation.
MLC tracking warrants clinical evaluation in AF STAR; leaves open translation to patient outcomes.
Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is an emerging treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it faces possibly the most challenging motion compensation scenario: both respiratory and cardiac motion. Multi-leaf collimator (MLC) tracking is clinically used for lung cancer treatments but its capabilities with intracardiac targets is unknown. We report the first experimental results of MLC tracking for intracardiac targets. Five AF STAR plans of varying complexity were created. All delivered 5 × 10 Gy to both pulmonary vein antra. Three healthy human target motion trajectories were acquired with ultrasound and programmed into a motion platform. Plans were delivered with a linac to a dosimeter placed on the motion platform. For each motion trace, each plan was delivered with no MLC tracking and with MLC tracking with and without motion prediction. Dosimetric accuracy was assessed with γ-tests and dose metrics. MLC tracking improved the dosimetric accuracy in all measurements compared to non-tracking experiments. The average 2%/2 mm γ-failure rate was improved from 13.1% with no MLC tracking to 5.9% with MLC tracking (p < 0.001) and 7.2% with MLC tracking and no motion prediction (p < 0.001). MLC tracking significantly improved the consistency between planned and delivered target dose coverage. The 95% target coverage with the prescription dose (V100) was improved from 60% of deliveries with no MLC tracking to 80% of deliveries with MLC tracking (p = 0.03). MLC tracking was successfully implemented for the first time for intracardiac motion compensation. MLC tracking provided significant dosimetric accuracy improvements in AF STAR experiments, even with challenging cardiac and respiratory-induced target motion and complex treatment plans. These results warrant further investigation and optimisation of MLC tracking for intracardiac target motion compensation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lydiard et al. (2018) studied Atrial fibrillation. Multi-leaf collimator (MLC) tracking vs. No MLC tracking was evaluated on Average 2%/2 mm γ-failure rate (p=< 0.001). Multi-leaf collimator tracking significantly improved dosimetric accuracy in AF STAR experiments, reducing the average 2%/2 mm γ-failure rate from 13.1% to 5.9% (p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: