Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the predictive value of NLR, MPV, and PDW for the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Do neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet correlation parameters predict the no-reflow phenomenon after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
Do neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet correlation parameters predict the no-reflow phenomenon after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
NLR, MPV, and PDW independently predict no-reflow after primary PCI in STEMI patients, though combining them does not improve predictive accuracy over NLR alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support NLR, MPV, and PDW for no-reflow risk stratification in STEMI; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Objective To evaluate the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), mean platelet volume (MPV), and platelet distribution width (PDW) for the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Methods: Patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention from January 2017 to April 2019 were consecutively enrolled in this study and were split into the control and no-reflow groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors. Receiver operating characteristic curves were carried out to evaluate the predictive value. Results: A total of 455 patients were included and the incidence of the no-reflow was 19.6%. After the adjustment of confounding factors, logistic regression analyses showed that the NLR (odds ratio [OR] per unit increase: 1.107, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.044–1.172, p = .001), MPV (OR: 1.398, 95% CI: 1.010–1.937, p = .044), and PDW (OR: 1.392, 95% CI: 1.012–1.914, p = .042) were all independent predictors. In the prediction of the no-reflow, the NLR had the largest area under the curve of 0.650 (95% CI: 0.593–0.708) with 90% sensitivity and 36% specificity. The area under the curve of the combination of NLR + MPV was 0.676 and that of NLR + PDW was 0.654. Conclusions: The NLR, MPV and PDW are all associated with the no-reflow. However, there is no significant difference in the predictive value of these indicators. The combinations of NLR and platelet-associated parameters also do not show a better predictive value than NLR alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: