Why the study?
Does targeted deletion of NF-kappaB p50 affect cardiac remodeling and dysfunction following myocardial infarction in mice?
Does targeted deletion of NF-kappaB p50 affect cardiac remodeling and dysfunction following myocardial infarction in mice?
Targeted deletion of NF-kappaB p50 in mice exacerbates cardiac remodeling and systolic dysfunction following myocardial infarction.
NF-κB p50 deletion worsens post-MI remodeling in mice; hypothesis-generating for human translation, no clinical implications yet.
Myocardial infarction is commonly complicated by left ventricular remodeling, a process that leads to cardiac dilatation, congestive heart failure and death. The innate immune system plays a pivotal role in the remodeling process via nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB activation. The NF-kappaB transcription factor family includes several subunits (p50, p52, p65, c-Rel, and Rel B) that respond to myocardial ischemia. The function of NF-kappaB p50, however, is controversial in this process. To clarify the role of NF-kappaB p50 in postinfarct left ventricular remodeling, myocardial infarction was induced in wild-type 129Bl6 mice and NF-kappaB p50-deficient mice. Without affecting infarct size, deletion of NF-kappaB p50 markedly increased the extent of expansive remodeling (end-diastolic volume: 176+/-13 microL versus 107+/-11 microL; P=0.003) and aggravated systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction: 16.1+/-1.5% versus 24.7+/-3.7%; P=0.029) in a 28-day time period. Interstitial fibrosis and hypertrophy in the noninfarcted myocardium was increased in NF-kappaB p50 knockout mice. In the infarct area, a lower collagen density was observed, which was accompanied by an increased number of macrophages, higher gelatinase activity and increased inflammatory cytokine expression. In conclusion, targeted deletion of NF-kappaB p50 results in enhanced cardiac remodeling and functional deterioration following myocardial infarction by increasing matrix remodeling and inflammation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timmers et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: