The study demonstrates that LDL binding to platelets and its effect on aggregation differs significantly between normal subjects and those with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, suggesting different binding specificities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No immediate clinical implications; leaves open distinct LDL-platelet interactions in hypercholesterolemia models.
The binding of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) as well as LDL modified by cyclohexanedione (CHD-LDL) to gel-filtered platelets (GFP) and its effect on platelet function were studied in normal and in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemic (HFH) subjects. Only normal-derived LDL could significantly compete with normal 125I-labelled LDL for binding to normal platelets. When GFP from normal subjects were incubated with normal LDL at concentrations of 25-200 micrograms of protein/ml, platelet aggregation in the presence of thrombin (0.5 i.u./ml) was increased by 65-186%. CHD-LDL, at similar concentrations, caused the opposite effect and decreased platelet aggregation by 26-47%. Both LDL and CHD-LDL (100 micrograms/ml) from HFH patients, when incubated with normal GFP, caused a significant reduction in platelet aggregation (33 and 50% respectively). When HFH-derived platelets were used, both patient LDL and CHD-LDL (but not the normal lipoprotein) could markedly compete with the patient 125I-labelled LDL for binding to the platelets. LDL and CHD-LDL (100 micrograms/ml) from normal subjects decreased aggregation of HFH-platelets by 52 and 85% respectively, while corresponding concentrations of LDL derived from HFH subjects (HFH-LDL) and CHD-LDL derived from HFH subjects (CHD-HFH-LDL) increased platelet aggregation by 165 and 65% respectively. The present results support the following conclusions: platelet activation by LDL in normal subjects is through the arginine-rich apoprotein-binding site; more than one binding site for LDL exists on platelets; under certain circumstances, LDL binding can cause a reduction in platelet activity; specificity for LDL binding to the platelets resides in different regions of the lipoprotein in HFH and in normal subjects. We have thus suggested a model for LDL-platelet interaction in normal and in HFH subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shmulewitz et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: