Why the study?
Does Logiparin reduce deep venous thrombosis compared to unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing general surgery?
Does Logiparin reduce deep venous thrombosis compared to unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing general surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Logiparin at 3,500 IU and unfractionated heparin showed similar efficacy for DVT prophylaxis in general surgery patients, and weight-based dose adjustment of Logiparin is not recommended.
A multicentre, double-blind, randomised trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of a low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparin, Logiparin, with that of an unfractionated (UF) heparin in the prophylactic treatment of thrombosis in patients undergoing general surgery. A total of 1,290 patients were randomised to receive a single daily dose of Logiparin (2,500 IU: 431 patients; 3,500 IU: 430 patients) or UF heparin (2 x 5,000 IU: 429 patients). The incidence of the main end point, deep venous thrombosis, was found to be significantly different between the groups (p = 0.03), whereas the incidence of severe haemorrhage was not (p = 0.05). The plasma anti-Xa activity was found to be correlated with body weight, but correlated only very weakly with antithrombotic activity (p = 0.045) after adjustment in a stepwise multivariate analysis, and did not significantly correlate with the incidence of haemorrhage. Logiparin at 3,500 IU and UF heparin showed similar efficacy. Although a correlation between plasma anti-Xa activity and body weight was observed, there is not sufficient evidence to recommend the adjustment of the Logiparin dose on patient's weight for prophylaxis in general surgery patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leizorovicz et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: