Key result
Cardiac contractility modulation increases LVEF by ~10% versus sham in dogs with chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
Acute studies showed cardiac contractility modulation improved LV function without increasing oxygen consumption, but the effects of long-term delivery on LV function and remodeling remained to be examined.
Does cardiac contractility modulation improve left ventricular function and remodeling in dogs with chronic heart failure?
RCT
Randomized
Does cardiac contractility modulation improve left ventricular function and remodeling in dogs with chronic heart failure?
Long-term cardiac contractility modulation therapy improves LV systolic function and reverses remodeling in a canine model of heart failure, with additive benefits when combined with beta-blockers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CCM improves LV function in canine HF; leaves open translation to patients pending clinical trials.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of long-term delivery of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) electric signals on left ventricular (LV) function and global, cellular, and molecular remodeling in dogs with chronic heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Acute studies in dogs with experimentally induced HF showed that CCM signals applied to the failing myocardium during the absolute refractory period improved LV function without increasing myocardial oxygen consumption. METHODS: In one study, dogs with intracoronary microembolization-induced HF were randomized to 3 months of active CCM monotherapy or to a sham-operated control group. In another study, 19 HF dogs were randomized to 3 months chronic monotherapy with extended release metoprolol succinate (MET-ER), MET-ER with CCM, or no therapy at all (control group). RESULTS: In CCM-only treated dogs, LV ejection fraction (EF) increased (27 +/- 1% vs. 33 +/- 1%, p < 0.0001) compared with a decrease in sham-operated control animals (27 +/- 1% vs. 23 +/- 1%, p < 0.001). The increase in EF seen with CCM-treated dogs was accompanied by reduced LV volumes, improved myocardial structure, reversal of the maladaptive fetal gene program, and an improvement in sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium cycling proteins. Dogs treated with a combination of MET-ER and CCM showed a greater increase in LV EF and a greater reversal of LV global, structural, and biochemical remodeling compared with dogs treated with MET-ER alone. CONCLUSIONS: In dogs with HF, long-term CCM therapy improves LV systolic function. The improvements are additive to those seen with beta-blockers. These findings are further strengthened by the concomitant benefits of CCM therapy on LV global, cellular, and biochemical remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imai et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in Chronic heart failure (HF). Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) vs. Sham-operated control or no therapy was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (p=< 0.0001). In dogs with chronic heart failure, 3 months of cardiac contractility modulation increased left ventricular ejection fraction to 33% compared to a decrease to 23% in sham-operated controls.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: