Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
With the emergence of nonplanar CMOS devices at the 22-nm node and beyond, it is highly likely that multigate device adoption will occur in a high-performance process technology, owing to the increased performance and area benefits. In this paper, for the first time, we evaluate symmetric (Symm-ΦG) and asymmetric (Asymm-ΦG) gate-workfunction FinFETs head to head in a high-performance process, using technology computer-aided design 3-D device simulations. We demonstrate that Asymm-ΦGshorted-gate (a-SG) n/p-FinFETs, which use both workfunctions corresponding to typical high-performance metal-gate n/p-FinFETs, are promising, as they can yield over two orders of magnitude lower leakage without excessive degradation in ON-state current, in comparison to Symm- ΦG shorted-gate (SG) FinFETs, placing them in a better position than back-gate biased independent-gate (IG) FinFETs for leakage reduction. Thereafter, we explore the design space of FinFET logic gates, latches, and flip-flops, for optimal tradeoffs in leakage versus delay and temperature, using mixed-mode 2-D device simulations. Elementary logic gates (such as INV, NAND2, NOR2, XOR2, and XNOR2) using Asymm-ΦGSG-mode FinFETs appear to be located optimally in the leakage-delay spectrum, in comparison to the most versatile configurations possible by mixing corresponding Symm-ΦGSG- and IG-mode FinFETs. Latches and flip-flops, however, require an astute combination of Symm-ΦGand Asymm-ΦGFinFETs to optimize leakage, delay, and setup time simultaneously.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhoj et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: