Key result
Tedisamil increased spatial coherence of ventricular fibrillation and decreased the mean defibrillation energy threshold from 8.9 to 6.1 joules in an open chest dog model.
Why the study?
Does tedisamil increase coherence during ventricular fibrillation and decrease defibrillation energy requirements in an open chest dog model?
Does tedisamil increase coherence during ventricular fibrillation and decrease defibrillation energy requirements in an open chest dog model?
Tedisamil increases spatial coherence and temporal regularity of ventricular fibrillation, which may contribute to reduced defibrillation energy requirements in a canine model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support preclinical development of coherence-modulating agents; leaves open translation to human defibrillation.
INTRODUCTION: Drugs which primarily prolong cardiac refractoriness decrease defibrillation voltage and energy requirements in animals and man. The effect of such drugs on ventricular fibrillation itself is not well understood. We hypothesized that tedisamil, an investigational antiarrhythmic drug which blocks Ito and IK repolarizing potassium channels, would increase organization of epicardial electrograms during ventricular fibrillation while it lowered defibrillation energy requirements. METHODS: We measured magnitude-squared coherence, a measure of spatial organization, and ventricular fibrillation (VF) cycle length, ventricular effective refractory period (VERP), and monophasic action potential duration (APD90) as well as defibrillation energy threshold (E50) at baseline and after 150 micrograms/kg of tedisamil (n = 13) or saline control (n = 6) in an open chest dog model. RESULTS: After tedisamil, mean magnitude-squared coherence increased by 132 +/- 133%, from 0.15 +/- 0.08 to 0.31 +/- 0.16 (P < 0.001); VF cycle length increased from 121 +/- 24 to 190 +/- 63 ms (P < 0.001) and became more regular, with the coefficient of variation between adjacent VF intervals decreasing from 14.1 +/- 6.9 to 3.9 +/- 2.2% (P < 0.001). Mean E50 decreased from 8.9 +/- 3.8 to 6.1 +/- 2.7 joules (P < 0.001); VERP increased from 158 +/- 30 to 201 +/- 31 ms (P < 0.001), and APD90 increased from 177 +/- 25 to 244 +/- 45 ms (P < 0.001) after tedisamil. No electrophysiologic parameter was changed after saline infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Tedisamil increases both spatial coherence and temporal regularity of ventricular fibrillation. These effects on 'order' during VF may be in part responsible for the observed reduction in defibrillation energy requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dorian et al. (1997) studied Ventricular fibrillation (n=19). Tedisamil vs. Saline control was evaluated on Defibrillation energy threshold (E50) (p=<0.001). Tedisamil increased spatial coherence of ventricular fibrillation and decreased the mean defibrillation energy threshold from 8.9 to 6.1 joules in an open chest dog model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: