Why the study?
Does concurrent administration of quinidine or verapamil alter digoxin oral clearance in hospital inpatients?
Does concurrent administration of quinidine or verapamil alter digoxin oral clearance in hospital inpatients?
Mixed-effect modeling can effectively detect and quantify clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions, such as the reduction in digoxin clearance by quinidine and verapamil, in patient populations.
May elevate digoxin exposure in quinidine- or verapamil-treated inpatients; supports mixed-effect modeling for interaction detection but leaves open prospective confirmation.
Mixed-effect modeling has been suggested as a possible tool to detect and describe drug interactions in patient populations receiving drug combinations for the treatment of disease states. The mixed-effect modeling program, NONMEM, was used to measure the effects of the well-known digoxin-quinidine and digoxin-verapamil drug interactions in 294 patients receiving oral digoxin as hospital inpatients. Fourteen percent of the population took either quinidine or verapamil concurrently with digoxin (mean quinidine dose = 857 +/- 397 mg/day, verapamil = 261 +/- 110 mg/day). Two regression models for digoxin oral clearance were used. Model 1 used the knowledge that digoxin is eliminated by both renal and nonrenal routes (TVCL = ClNR+m.CrCl, where TVCL is the population digoxin oral clearance, ClNR is the nonrenal clearance, and m is the slope of the line that relates creatinine clearance (CrCl) to digoxin clearance); model 2 used a more conventional regression approach with a simple series of multipliers. For both models, quinidine administration decreased population digoxin oral clearance by approximately 45% and verapamil therapy decreased population digoxin oral clearance by approximately 30%. These values are similar to those found by traditional drug interaction studies conducted in small patient or normal subject populations. Mixed-effect modeling can detect clinically relevant drug interactions and produce information similar to that found in traditional pharmacokinetic crossover study designs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bauer et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: