Why the study?
Women undergoing TAVI exhibit distinct baseline, anatomical, procedural, and outcome characteristics compared to men, highlighting the need for a women-centric approach.
Women undergoing TAVI present with distinct anatomical and clinical profiles that increase procedural complexity and vascular complications, yet they paradoxically achieve superior long-term survival compared to men, emphasizing the need for sex-specific procedural planning.
Women may warrant tailored TAVI planning despite higher complications; leaves open need for prospective sex-specific trials.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a cornerstone in the management of severe aortic stenosis across a broad spectrum of surgical risk categories. Women undergoing TAVI represent nearly half of all patients, yet they exhibit distinct baseline, anatomical, procedural, and outcome characteristics compared to men. Women are typically older at presentation, have smaller aortic annuli and ilio-femoral vessels, and exhibit distinct patterns of left ventricular remodeling. These anatomical and physiological features influence device selection, procedural strategy, and risk of complications. Despite higher procedural risks – especially vascular and bleeding complications – women demonstrate superior long-term survival after TAVI compared to men. This article provides a comprehensive, women-focused review of TAVI by incorporating evidence from major registries, clinical trials, and recent sex-specific reviews. It explores baseline differences, procedural implications, complications, outcomes, mechanistic explanations, clinical recommendations, and future research priorities, aiming to highlight the need for a women-centric approach to TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Satpathy et al. (2026) conducted a review in Severe aortic stenosis. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) vs. Men (sex-based comparison) was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: