Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 17, 2005HeartOpen Access

Interventional cardiology: it’s a hairy business

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Intravenous infusion of glyceryl trinitrate substantially reduced the amplitude of the secondary reflected wave by a mean of 14.6 mm Hg (P<0.0001) without changing the primary wave amplitude.

Why the study?

Does intravenous glyceryl trinitrate alter arterial stiffness and improve left ventricular afterload in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?

Population

50 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, before cardiopulmonary bypass

Comparison

Intravenous infusion of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) vs Baseline measurements before GTN infusion

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

Immediate (during surgery, before cardiopulmonary bypass)

Authors

AWAndrew WiperUniversity of Liverpool

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

GTN may lower wave reflection and LV afterload in cardiac surgery; leaves open outcome benefits pending randomized trials.

Structured PICO

Does intravenous glyceryl trinitrate alter arterial stiffness and improve left ventricular afterload in patients undergoing cardiac surgery?

P
Population
50 patients undergoing cardiac surgery evaluated before cardiopulmonary bypass to assess the physiological effects of intravenous GTN.
I
Intervention
Intravenous infusion of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN)
C
Comparator
Baseline measurements before GTN infusion
O
Outcome
Ascending aortic pressure waves (primary and secondary components)surrogate

Main Result

Mean Difference: 14.6

p-value: p=<0.0001

Intravenous GTN reduces arterial stiffness and left ventricular afterload primarily by dilating peripheral muscular arteries and reducing wave reflection.

Limitations

  • Relative contributions of arteriolar and venous dilatation to the fall in mean pressure were unable to be separated.

Cite This Study

Andrew Wiper (2005) studied Cardiac surgery (n=50). Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) vs. Baseline (before infusion) was evaluated on Amplitude of the secondary reflected wave (Mean reduction 14.6 mm Hg, p=<0.0001). Intravenous infusion of glyceryl trinitrate substantially reduced the amplitude of the secondary reflected wave by a mean of 14.6 mm Hg (P<0.0001) without changing the primary wave amplitude.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9e5fca55f529b8e9d6f014https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2005.064899
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Reflected pressure waves in the ascending aorta: effect of glyceryl trinitrate1988 · 83 citations
  2. 2Pulse Pressure, Arterial Stiffness, and Drug Treatment of Hypertension2001 · 244 citations
  3. 3Aortic input impedance in heart failure: comparison with normal subjects and its changes during vasodilator therapy*1984 · 66 citations
  4. 42003 European society of hypertension - European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension2003 · 2,604 citations
  5. 5Vasoactive Drugs Influence Aortic Augmentation Index Independently of Pulse-Wave Velocity in Healthy Men2001 · 395 citations