Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 1, 1988Cardiovascular Research

Reflected pressure waves in the ascending aorta: effect of glyceryl trinitrate

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Glyceryl trinitrate 0.3 mg sublingually reduced the amplitude of the global reflection coefficient at 1.05 Hz compared to control (0.48 vs 0.70; p<0.001), diminishing cardiac pulsatile load.

Why the study?

Does sublingual glyceryl trinitrate reduce pressure wave reflections in the ascending aorta?

Population

Subjects undergoing measurement of arterial pressure transmission between two high fidelity pressure…

Comparison

Glyceryl trinitrate 0.3 mg sublingually vs Baseline/control measurements prior to glyceryl…

Design

Other

Authors

DFD. H FITCHETTRoyal Victoria HospitalGSGerald J. SimkusRoyal Columbian HospitalJBJean-Pierre BeaudryMcGill University Health Centre

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May lower pulsatile load acutely; leaves open outcome benefits in prospective trials.

Structured PICO

Does sublingual glyceryl trinitrate reduce pressure wave reflections in the ascending aorta?

P
Population
Subjects undergoing measurement of arterial pressure transmission between two high fidelity pressure transducers in the ascending aorta (specific demographics and sample size not stated)
I
Intervention
Glyceryl trinitrate 0.3 mg sublingually
C
Comparator
Baseline/control measurements prior to glyceryl trinitrate administration
O
Outcome
Effect on pressure wave reflections in the ascending aorta (including systolic arterial pressure, aortic input impedance, apparent phase velocity, and global reflection coefficient)surrogate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0.48% vs 0.7%

p-value: p=<0.001

Glyceryl trinitrate reduces cardiac pulsatile load by diminishing the amplitude of wave reflections arriving back in the aorta during systole, without affecting aortic compliance or arteriolar resistance.

Cite This Study

FITCHETT et al. (1988) studied this question. Glyceryl trinitrate vs. Control was evaluated on Global reflection coefficient amplitude at 1.05 Hz (p=<0.001). Glyceryl trinitrate 0.3 mg sublingually reduced the amplitude of the global reflection coefficient at 1.05 Hz compared to control (0.48 vs 0.70; p<0.001), diminishing cardiac pulsatile load.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1035205725bbd5cc60a82ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/22.7.494
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of glyceryl trinitrate on peripheral arteries alters left ventricular hydraulic load in man1986 · 186 citations
  2. 2Potential deleterious haemodynamic effects of glyceryl trinitrate on myocardial ischaemia in man.1984 · 5 citations
  3. 3Quantification of glyceryl trinitrate effect through analysis of the synthesised ascending aortic pressure waveform2002 · 54 citations
  4. 4Benefit of glyceryl trinitrate on arterial stiffness is directly due to effects on peripheral arteries2005 · 62 citations
  5. 5Interventional cardiology: it’s a hairy business2005 · 19 citations