Key result
The newly developed immunochromatographic assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity for detecting anti-hepatitis A virus IgM, with a 10-fold higher analytical sensitivity than the commercial MEIA.
Why the study?
Does an immunochromatographic assay improve the detection of anti-HAV IgM compared to a microparticle enzyme immunoassay in patients with suspected acute hepatitis A?
Observational (n=275)
Does an immunochromatographic assay improve the detection of anti-HAV IgM compared to a microparticle enzyme immunoassay in patients with suspected acute hepatitis A?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The newly developed immunochromatographic assay provides a rapid, simple, and highly sensitive alternative to MEIA for the detection of anti-HAV IgM.
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a causative agent of acute hepatitis, which is transmitted by person-to-person contact and via the faecal-oral route. Acute HAV infection is usually confirmed by anti-HAV IgM detection. In order to detect anti-HAV IgM in the serum of patients infected with HAV, we developed a rapid assay based on immunochromatography (ICA) and evaluated the sensitivity of this assay by comparing it with a commercial microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) that is widely used for serological diagnosis. RESULTS: The newly developed ICA showed 100% sensitivity and specificity when used to test 150 anti-HAV IgM-positive sera collected from infected patients and 75 negative sera from healthy subjects. Also, the sensitivity of ICA is about 10 times higher than MEIA used in this study by determining end point to detect independent on infected genotype of HAV. In addition, the ICA was able to detect 1 positive sample from among 50 sera from acute hepatitis patients that had tested negative for anti-HAV IgM using the MEIA. CONCLUSION: Conclusively, ICA for the detection of anti-HAV IgM will be very effective for rapid assay to apply clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigation on epidemics due to the simplicity, rapidity and specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Hepatitis A virus infection (n=275). Immunochromatographic assay (ICA) vs. Microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity for detecting anti-HAV IgM. The newly developed immunochromatographic assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity for detecting anti-hepatitis A virus IgM, with a 10-fold higher analytical sensitivity than the commercial MEIA.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: