Key result
EuroScore II and cardiogenic shock predict left main PCI survival better than SYNTAX-1 score.
Why the study?
While CABG is recommended for stable patients with ULMCA stenosis and SYNTAX-1 > 32, PCI may be preferable in unstable or high operative risk patients, prompting an investigation into predictors of survival in unstable patients with high SYNTAX-1-score.
What are the predictors of survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis?
Cohort (n=142)
No
What are the predictors of survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis?
In unstable patients undergoing PCI for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis, prognosis is driven by acute clinical presentation and EuroScore II rather than the anatomical SYNTAX-1 score.
OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to investigate predictors of survival in unstable patients with high SYNTAX-1-score. BACKGROUND: In significant unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis, treatment options include percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). While CABG is recommended for stable patients with ULMCA stenosis and a SYNTAX-1-score > 32, PCI may be preferable in unstable or high operative risk patients. METHODS: Retrospective single-center all-comers registry study. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients underwent ULMCA-PCI (~72.9 years, 23.2% females, 54.2% survival in 2-year follow-up), 84 of whom had a SYNTAX-1 > 32 (37.4 ± 12.8). Patients in the high-SYNTAX-1-group (score > 32) were more often in an acute condition compared to low-SYNTAX-2-group (score ≤ 32) including acute myocardial infarction (76.2% vs. 57.4%, p = .024), cardiogenic shock (48.2% vs. 14.8%, p = .001), or need for mechanical support (36.1% vs. 11.1%, p = .001). Survival was predicted by the acute condition including cardiogenic shock (OR 0.06 and 0.05) and myocardial infarction (OR 0.03 and 0.34) in both groups. Performance of the SYNTAX-1-score was limited in our patient collective in both groups (c-index 0.65 vs. 0.63) while SYNTAX-2-PCI-score performed better (c-index 0.67 vs. 0.67). EuroScore II had the best discriminative ability (c-index 0.87 vs. 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients undergoing ULMCA-PCI presented in acute conditions with high SYNTAX-1-score, and is therefore underrepresented in clinical trials. Prognosis was best predicted by the acute condition and the EuroScore II. These data suggest that therapy in unstable patients should be guided by clinical condition over the anatomical SYNTAX-1-score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Staudacher et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis (n=142). High SYNTAX-1 score (>32) vs. Low SYNTAX-1 score (≤32) was evaluated on Survival. In patients undergoing PCI for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis, survival was best predicted by acute conditions like cardiogenic shock and EuroScore II rather than SYNTAX-1 score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: