Key result
Reduced Tpeak-Tend interval following CRT predicts favorable LVEF recovery in patients with heart failure.
Why the study?
ECG is a practical method to evaluate response to CRT, but the predictive value of T-wave duration and Tp-e interval following CRT implantation needed assessment.
Do T-wave duration and Tpeak-Tend interval predict favorable response to CRT in heart failure patients?
Observational (n=67)
No
Do T-wave duration and Tpeak-Tend interval predict favorable response to CRT in heart failure patients?
Odds Ratio: 0.9 (95% CI 0.86–0.952)
p-value: p=<0.001
T-wave duration and Tp-e interval are potential new ECG markers for predicting favorable echocardiographic response to CRT in heart failure patients.
BACKGROUND: The use of electrocardiography (ECG) is a practical method to evaluate the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation, as it is easily performed and saves time. AIM: This study aimed to assess the predictive value of the T-wave duration and Tpeak-Tend (Tp-e) interval following the CRT implantation administered to heart failure patients. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III, ambulatory class IV, normal sinus rhythm, who have complete left bundle branch block on ECG and treated with CRT were included in this study. Patients who have manifested a ≥10% improvement in ejection fraction following CRT implantation, were categorized as "responders", and the remaining patients were categorized as "non-responders". ECGs and echocardiograms were evaluated both six months before and after CRT implantation. RESULTS: The post-CRT QRS duration (P = 0.01), cQT interval (P = 0.005), T-wave (P <0.001), and Tp-e interval (P <0.001) were found to be significantly reduced in the responder group compared to the non-responder group. The receiver operating characteristics curve analyses revealed that the predictive optimal cut-off of the T-wave was <182 ms (P <0.001), and that of the Tp-e interval was <92 ms (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: T-wave and Tp-e interval may be independent predictors of a favorable CRT response in heart failure patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Usalp et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=67). Tpeak-Tend (Tp-e) interval vs. Longer Tp-e interval was evaluated on Favorable response to CRT (absolute LVEF recovery ≥10% at 6 months) (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.860-0.952, p=<0.001). A reduced Tpeak-Tend interval following cardiac resynchronization therapy was an independent predictor of a favorable echocardiographic response in patients with heart failure (OR 0.90).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: