Key result
Digoxin pretreatment in ischemic dogs produces ~116% larger myocardial infarcts and treatment-resistant arrhythmias.
Why the study?
Does digoxin pretreatment worsen infarct size and arrhythmias during acute myocardial ischemia in a dog model?
Does digoxin pretreatment worsen infarct size and arrhythmias during acute myocardial ischemia in a dog model?
In a canine model, therapeutic concentrations of digoxin prior to acute myocardial ischemia increased infarct size and rendered ventricular arrhythmias resistant to conventional antiarrhythmic therapy.
May caution digoxin use in ischemia; leaves open human translation and requires clinical studies.
Recently, this laboratory has demonstrated an enhanced susceptibility toward the development of lethal ventricular arrhythmias occurring in response to acute posterolateral ischemia in dogs with previous anterior myocardial infarction in the presence of therapeutic serum concentrations of digoxin. In the present study, acute posterolateral myocardial ischemia was produced in the absence of previous myocardial infarction in 15 digoxin-pretreated (1.19 +/- 0.21 ng/ml serum digoxin, 5-7 days pretreatment) and 11 vehicle-pretreated dogs. The incidences of sudden ventricular fibrillation and of 24 h arrhythmic mortality in response to posterolateral ischemia were 4/15 (27%) vs. 1/11 (9%) (p = 0.23) and 7/15 (47%) vs. 4/11 (36%) (p = 0.27) for digoxin- vs. vehicle-pretreated dogs, respectively. Ventricular ectopic activity at 24 and 48 h after the onset of posterolateral ischemia was reduced significantly by both intravenous lidocaine (1.0-5.0 mg/kg) and verapamil (50.0-500.0 micrograms/kg) in the vehicle-pretreated dogs, whereas neither antiarrhythmic agent significantly suppressed ventricular ectopy in the digoxin-pretreated dogs. The mean sizes for developing posterolateral myocardial infarctions (percentage of left ventricle) were greater for the digoxin-pretreatment group (31.9 +/- 2.8%) vs. vehicle-pretreatment group (14.8 +/- 2.0%, p less than 0.001). These findings suggest that uncomplicated acute myocardial ischemia in the presence of serum concentrations of digoxin that are considered clinically therapeutic may result in the development of larger areas of developing myocardial infarction and in the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias that are less sensitive to suppression with conventional antiarrhythmic agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lynch et al. (1988) studied Acute myocardial ischemia and infarction (n=26). Digoxin vs. Vehicle was evaluated on sudden ventricular fibrillation (p=0.23). Digoxin pretreatment in dogs with acute myocardial ischemia resulted in larger myocardial infarctions (31.9% vs 14.8%, p<0.001) and arrhythmias less sensitive to conventional antiarrhythmic agents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: