Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 1988Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology

Evolving Myocardial Infarction in the Rat In Vivo

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Permanent coronary occlusion in rats reduces cardiac output ~41% with rapid wall thinning and necrosis.

Why the study?

Despite low collateral flow in rat hearts, many reports claim pharmacological limitation of infarct size after permanent coronary occlusion, prompting investigation of possible artefacts.

Population

Isolated rat hearts (n=12/group) with permanent coronary occlusion

Comparison

Permanent coronary occlusion at various time points vs sham operated controls

Design

Preclinical experimental study

Follow-up

Up to 48 hours

Authors

DHDavid J. HearseCross-Cutting CardiologyVRVincent RichardKuban State University
Derek M. Yellon
Derek M. YellonGeneral Cardiology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Rat permanent occlusion models risk confounding infarct size claims via staining artefacts; leaves open true pharmacological efficacy pending refined methods.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Rats subjected to permanent coronary occlusion or sham operation, evaluated at multiple time points up to 48 hours to assess cardiac function and infarct evolution.
I
Intervention
Permanent coronary occlusion evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, 24, or 48 hours
C
Comparator
Sham operated controls
O
Outcome
Cardiac function (cardiac output), lumen areas, areas of underperfusion, minimum wall thickness, and tissue necrosis (tetrazolium staining and histology)surrogate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 37.7% vs 63.8%

Apparent pharmacological limitation of infarct size in rat models of permanent coronary occlusion may be confounded by artefacts related to tissue remodeling, white cell infiltration, and tetrazolium staining characteristics.

Limitations

  • Incorrect designation of tissue as tetrazolium positive within the severely ischaemic zone of underperfusion
  • Inappropriately equating the zone of underperfusion to the risk zone
  • Possibility that some drugs might affect white cell infiltration, tetrazolium staining characteristics, wall thinning, and tissue remodelling

Cite This Study

Hearse et al. (1988) studied Myocardial infarction. Permanent coronary occlusion vs. Sham operated controls was evaluated on Cardiac output. Permanent coronary occlusion in rats reduced cardiac output to 37.7 ml/min compared to 63.8 ml/min in sham controls, with substantial wall thinning and necrosis developing by 12 hours.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aaa0e8b3e26af5d367e5dd0https://doi.org/10.1097/00005344-198806000-00011
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Problems Related to Infarct Size Measurements in the Rat Heart1991 · 15 citations
  2. 2Effect of early coronary artery reperfusion on infarct development in a model of low collateral flow1987 · 48 citations
  3. 3Myocardial infarct size and ventricular function in rats.1979 · 1,283 citations
  4. 4Histological Quantification of Chronic Myocardial Infarct in Rats2016 · 14 citations
  5. 5The effect of delayed reperfusion following infarction in the rat on structural changes in viable myocardium1997 · 8 citations