Key result
Permanent coronary occlusion in rats reduces cardiac output ~41% with rapid wall thinning and necrosis.
Why the study?
Despite low collateral flow in rat hearts, many reports claim pharmacological limitation of infarct size after permanent coronary occlusion, prompting investigation of possible artefacts.
Population
Isolated rat hearts (n=12/group) with permanent coronary occlusion
Comparison
Permanent coronary occlusion at various time points vs sham operated controls
Design
Preclinical experimental study
Follow-up
Up to 48 hours
Authors
Loading...
Rat permanent occlusion models risk confounding infarct size claims via staining artefacts; leaves open true pharmacological efficacy pending refined methods.
Absolute Event Rate: 37.7% vs 63.8%
Apparent pharmacological limitation of infarct size in rat models of permanent coronary occlusion may be confounded by artefacts related to tissue remodeling, white cell infiltration, and tetrazolium staining characteristics.
Hearse et al. (1988) studied Myocardial infarction. Permanent coronary occlusion vs. Sham operated controls was evaluated on Cardiac output. Permanent coronary occlusion in rats reduced cardiac output to 37.7 ml/min compared to 63.8 ml/min in sham controls, with substantial wall thinning and necrosis developing by 12 hours.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: