Key result
L-cis diltiazem before reperfusion dose-dependently limits infarct size and improves thickening fraction recovery in ischemic rabbits.
Why the study?
There was no evidence that l-cis diltiazem protects against ischemia/reperfusion injury in vivo despite its known in vitro myocardial protective effects.
Does l-cis diltiazem reduce infarct size in an in vivo rabbit model of ischemia/reperfusion injury?
Does l-cis diltiazem reduce infarct size in an in vivo rabbit model of ischemia/reperfusion injury?
l-cis diltiazem demonstrates cardioprotective effects by reducing infarct size in an in vivo rabbit model of ischemia/reperfusion injury, independent of calcium channel blocking activity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May protect rabbit myocardium from ischemia/reperfusion injury; leaves open clinical translation.
l-cis Diltiazem, an optical isomer of diltiazem, protects against myocardial dysfunction in vitro, whereas its Ca2+ channel blocking activity is about 100 times less potent than that of diltiazem. However, there is no evidence that l-cis diltiazem actually protects against ischemia/reperfusion injury in vivo. To assess this, we employed an anesthetized rabbit model, where the left circumflex artery was occluded for 15 min and reperfused for 360 min. Treatment with diltiazem before and during ischemia (bolus 200 microg/kg and 15 microg/kg per minute for 25 min, i.v.; 575 microg/kg total) showed slightly depressed hemodynamic parameters, while l-cis diltiazem (1150 microg/kg) had no effect. Treatment with l-cis diltiazem produced a high recovery of the thickening fraction and limited the infarct size in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the treatment with l-cis diltiazem (1150 microg/kg) or diltiazem (575 microg/kg) 5 min before reperfusion also limited the infarct size, but not after reperfusion. These results suggest that l-cis diltiazem affects some events in the onset of reperfusion, independently of Ca2+-channel-blocking action. Our observations are the first to show that l-cis diltiazem demonstrated its cardioprotective action in the ischemic rabbit heart in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishida et al. (1999) studied Ischemia/reperfusion injury. l-cis diltiazem vs. diltiazem (575 microg/kg) was evaluated on Infarct size and recovery of thickening fraction. Treatment with l-cis diltiazem before reperfusion limited infarct size in a dose-dependent manner and improved recovery of the thickening fraction in an ischemic rabbit model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: