Key result
Four reagent-instrument combinations show high agreement sufficient to classify patient anticoagulation status.
Why the study?
The agreement of INR values obtained with different thromboplastin/instrument combinations in patients on vitamin K antagonists was unclear.
Do different thromboplastin/instrument combinations provide high agreement in INR values for patients on vitamin K antagonists?
Cross-Sectional (n=330)
Do different thromboplastin/instrument combinations provide high agreement in INR values for patients on vitamin K antagonists?
Different reagent/instrument combinations for INR determination show high agreement, allowing reliable classification of anticoagulation efficacy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INR values from different reagent/instrument combinations support consistent anticoagulation classification; leaves open interchangeability across all clinical scenarios.
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The international normalized ratio (INR) is widely used to monitor patients on vitamin K antagonists. This study aimed to assess the agreement of INR values obtained with different thromboplastin/instrument combinations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: International normalized ratio was determined on plasmas from 330 patients undergoing antivitamin K treatment (with acenocoumarol), using two calibration methods and four reagent/instrument combinations: Both Neoplastine CI and Neoplastine CI Plus on STA-R instrument from Diagnostica STAGO, Asnières, France; and both Thromborel S and Innovin on SYSMEX 2100i instrument from Siemens Health Care Diagnostics, Marbung, Germany. The agreement analysis was done using the Bland-Altman plot and the Cohen Kappa coefficient. RESULTS: The mean of the differences between the INR values and the limits of agreement were -0.07 [-0.51 to 0.38] for the Neoplastine CI plus and Neoplastine CI reagents, -0.08 [-1.18 to 1.03] for the Thromborel S and Innovin reagents when the INR was calculated, -0.1 [-1.15 to 0.95] for the Thromborel S and Innovin reagents when the INR was directly calibrated and -0.1 [-0.7 to 0.5] for the Neoplastine CI plus and Thromborel S. Cohen's kappa coefficients were 0.94, 0.76, 0.85 and 0.82, respectively. NEW FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION: The agreement between the four reagent/instrument combinations was high enough to classify patients as inefficaciously or efficaciously anticoagulated. The data interpretation should always be related to the clinical purpose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baccouche et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Patients undergoing antivitamin K treatment (n=330). Different thromboplastin/instrument combinations was evaluated on Agreement of INR values. Agreement between four reagent/instrument combinations for INR determination was high (Cohen's kappa 0.76 to 0.94), sufficient to classify patients' anticoagulation status.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: