Key result
TAVI in cardiogenic shock achieves ~94% device success with acceptable 30-day mortality.
Why the study?
Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis complicated by cardiogenic shock has a grim prognosis, and data on TAVI as a treatment option in this setting are scant.
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) improve outcomes in patients with severe aortic valvulopathy complicated by cardiogenic shock?
Cohort (n=51)
Yes
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) improve outcomes in patients with severe aortic valvulopathy complicated by cardiogenic shock?
TAVI appears to be a feasible and potentially safe therapeutic option for patients with severe aortic valvulopathy complicated by cardiogenic shock, demonstrating high device success and acceptable 1-year mortality.
Supports TAVI feasibility in shock; hypothesis-generating without controls and needs RCTs before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study is to evaluate safety, feasibility, and mid-term outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in cardiogenic shock (CS). BACKGROUND: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (SAS) complicated by CS is indicated but associated with a grim prognosis. TAVI might be a more reasonable treatment option in this setting but data are scant. METHODS: From March 2008 to February 2019, 51 patients with severe aortic valvulopathy (native SAS or degenerated aortic bioprosthesis) and CS treated by TAVI in 11 European centers were included in this multicenter registry. Demographic, clinical, and procedural data were collected, as well as clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age of our study population was 75.8 ± 13, 49% were women, and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 19 ± 15%. Device success was achieved in 94.1%, with a 5% incidence of moderate/severe paravalvular leak. The 30-day events were mortality 11.8%, stroke 2.0%, vascular complications 5.9%, and acute kidney injury 34%. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 early safety endpoint was reached in 35.3% of cases. At 1-year of follow-up, the mortality rate was 25.7% and the readmission for congestive heart failure was 8.6%. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI seems to be a therapeutic option for patients with CS and SAS or degenerated aortic bioprosthesis in terms of both safety and efficacy at early and long-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fraccaro et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic valvulopathy and cardiogenic shock (n=51). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was evaluated on Device success. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic valvulopathy and cardiogenic shock demonstrated a 94.1% device success rate and 11.8% 30-day mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: