Key result
Magnetic resonance phase-contrast imaging techniques showed only a weak correlation (r = 0.19-0.60) with percutaneous Doppler ultrasound for measuring blood flow velocities in the carotid arteries.
Why the study?
How do different MR phase-contrast imaging techniques compare with percutaneous Doppler ultrasound for quantifying blood flow velocities in the carotid arteries?
Observational (n=14)
How do different MR phase-contrast imaging techniques compare with percutaneous Doppler ultrasound for quantifying blood flow velocities in the carotid arteries?
Effect estimate: r = 0.19-0.60
MR phase-contrast imaging techniques show only weak correlation with Doppler ultrasound for measuring carotid artery blood flow velocities, highlighting the influence of temporal and spatial resolution.
MR phase-contrast techniques yield comparable carotid velocities to Doppler in volunteers; leaves open validation in patients with vascular disease.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare blood flow velocities in the carotid arteries measured with three different magnetic resonance (MR) phase-contrast imaging techniques and with percutaneous Doppler ultrasound. METHODS: Fourteen healthy male volunteers with a mean age of 33 +/- 3.8 years were studied. Ultrasound and MR phase velocity mapping of both common carotid arteries (n = 28) was performed within 5 hours. A two-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence with retrospective cardiac gating, a sequence with prospective cardiac triggering, and a breath-hold sequence with prospective cardiac triggering were used. Resistance indexes and pulsatility indexes were calculated for all modalities. RESULTS: The comparison of flow velocities obtained with ultrasound and the different MR techniques led to a moderate correlation of the retrospective gated and prospective triggered MR techniques (eg, r = 0.73 for maximum systolic velocity). The worst correlation was found between the breath-hold technique and retrospective cardiac gating (eg, r = 0.004 for pulsatility index). There was a weak correlation of all three MR sequences compared with ultrasound (r = 0.19-0.60) CONCLUSIONS: A moderate correlation was found between velocities and indexes measured with the prospective cardiac-triggered phase-contrast MR technique and the retrospective cardiac-gated phase-contrast MR technique. A weak correlation was found between the three different MR techniques and ultrasound, as well as between the breath-hold prospective cardiac-triggered MR sequence and both of the other MR sequences. The influence of temporal and spatial resolution on MR phase-contrast velocity mapping was confirmed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seitz et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=14). Magnetic resonance (MR) phase-contrast imaging techniques vs. Percutaneous Doppler ultrasound was evaluated on Blood flow velocities in the carotid arteries (r = 0.19-0.60). Magnetic resonance phase-contrast imaging techniques showed only a weak correlation (r = 0.19-0.60) with percutaneous Doppler ultrasound for measuring blood flow velocities in the carotid arteries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: