Why the study?
Preclinical studies demonstrated an antihypertensive effect of renal denervation, but reports from clinical trials have been mixed.
Does catheter-based renal denervation reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension?
Does catheter-based renal denervation reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension?
This review highlights that contemporary, rigorously designed sham-controlled trials support the efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation in reducing blood pressure, positioning it as a potential adjunctive treatment for hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed renal denervation trial results leave open its role in resistant hypertension; additional RCTs required before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Catheter-based renal denervation has been studied as a potential therapeutic option to reduce high blood pressure (BP). Preclinical studies in some experimental models have demonstrated an antihypertensive effect of renal denervation but reports from clinical trials have been mixed METHODS: We performed a literature search using combinations of the key terms 'Cardiovascular diseases, Clinical trial, Pre-clinical trials, Resistant hypertension, Renal denervation, Ablation technique, Radiofrequency ablation, Ultrasound ablation, RADIANCE SOLO, SYMPLICITY HTN, SYPRAL HTN'. The databases searched were PubMed and OVID Medline. RESULTS: The initial SYMPLICITY HTN-1 AND HTN-2 clinical trials reported significant decreases in office BP but results from the more robustly designed SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial, which included sham controls and ambulatory BP monitoring, showed no significant antihypertensive effect. Interest in the use of renal denervation in hypertension was once again sparked by favourable results from the SPYRAL HTN-OFF Med trial CONCLUSION: We provide a thorough, critical analysis of key preclinical and clinical studies investigating the efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation as a treatment for hypertension and highlight future areas for research to allow better translation into clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: