Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 7, 2022Applied SciencesOpen Access

Effects of Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy on Right Ventricular Function: An Echocardiographic Study

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Cardiac contractility modulation therapy improved right ventricular systolic function at 6 months, increasing TAPSE from 16.6 to 18.5 mm (p < 0.05).

Why the study?

Little evidence was available regarding the effects of cardiac contractility modulation on right ventricular function and right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling.

Does cardiac contractility modulation therapy improve right ventricular function and RV-pulmonary artery coupling in patients with HFrEF?

Comparison

CCM therapy pre- vs post-treatment

Design

Echocardiographic observational study

Follow-up

six months

Authors

CCCarla ContaldiSVStefano De VivoMMMaria Martucci

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May support CCM for RV function in HFrEF; hypothesis-generating from cohort data, RCTs needed.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=21)

Structured PICO

Does cardiac contractility modulation therapy improve right ventricular function and RV-pulmonary artery coupling in patients with HFrEF?

P
Population
21 patients (mean age 65) with NYHA class III heart failure, ejection fraction < 40%, and QRS < 120 ms, evaluated at baseline and 6 months after cardiac contractility modulation therapy.
E
Exposure
Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy for 6 months
O
Outcome
Right ventricular systolic function and RV-pulmonary artery (PA) coupling (measured by TAPSE, RVs, RV free-wall strain, PASP, and TAPSE/PASP ratio) at 6 monthssurrogate

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 18.5% vs 16.6%

p-value: p=< 0.05

Cardiac contractility modulation therapy is associated with significant improvements in right ventricular systolic function and RV-pulmonary artery coupling at 6 months in patients with HFrEF.

Cite This Study

Contaldi et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced and mild reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFmrEF) (n=21). Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) vs. Baseline was evaluated on Tricuspid annular systolic excursion (TAPSE) (p=< 0.05). Cardiac contractility modulation therapy improved right ventricular systolic function at 6 months, increasing TAPSE from 16.6 to 18.5 mm (p < 0.05).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a818e882f94e177df06c930https://doi.org/10.3390/app12157917
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Effects of Device-Based Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy on Left Ventricle Global Longitudinal Strain and Myocardial Mechano-Energetic Efficiency in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction2022 · 12 citations
  2. 2Clinical Effects of Cardiac Contractility Modulation in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Systolic Function2020 · 15 citations
  3. 3Dynamics of heart failure markers and cardiac reverse remodeling in patients receiving cardiac contractility modulation therapy2021 · 4 citations
  4. 4Cardiac contractility modulation therapy improves health status in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study ( <scp>CCM‐HFpEF</scp> )2022 · 46 citations
  5. 5Cardiac Contractility Modulation in 20182018 · 46 citations